Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On 28-mrt-2006, at 3:01, Nicholas Riley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:00:07PM -0800, Christopher Barker wrote: >> What happens if you double-click on a *.egg? > > That'd be an incredibly cool utility to have, and a lot easier to > write than something like PackageManager. Before anyone sta

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51

On 28-mrt-2006, at 3:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> From: Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: pythonmac-sig@python.org >> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Installing numpy 0.9.6 problems >> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:50:33 -0800 > >> Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >>> I'd prefer to have 1 install

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

> Without any experience with "eggs" (I believe that they are another > Phillip Eby brainstorm?), can I suggest that a standard command-line Yep, they are. > Is there a specification for the "egg" format? http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs They're zipfiles containing additional

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: >>> I'd certainly prefer eggs where possible, but transitionally we're >>> definitely going to need *.mpkgs. Maybe both for now, and/or >>> separate >>> pages for .mpkgs and binary eggs? >> >> What happens if you double-click on a *.egg? >> >> I

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51

On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> From: Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: pythonmac-sig@python.org >> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Installing numpy 0.9.6 problems >> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:50:33 -0800 > >> Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >>> I'd prefer to have 1 ins

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> No, I mean that that URL won't directly list any packages. It'll >> be a >> listing of package lists and enough information to direct a newish >> user >> to the right list. > > Then yes, that's a great idea. I

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Christopher Barker wrote: > >> Then yes, that's a great idea. I am, as we e-speak, reworking >> those pages with a different structure now. I'm no web designer, >> but it should give us something that someone can make prettier if >> t

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] The Universal Buld and py2app

On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Bob, > > What's the status of Py2App and the new universal build. I'd like > to start making packages for it, but I"d really like bdist_mpkg. Not Yet. I have some patches I need to integrate and test. I'll try and get to it this week

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

> > I'd certainly prefer eggs where possible, but transitionally we're > > definitely going to need *.mpkgs. Maybe both for now, and/or separate > > pages for .mpkgs and binary eggs? > > What happens if you double-click on a *.egg? > > I like that anyone with OS-X can figure out how to install

[Pythonmac-SIG] The Universal Buld and py2app

Bob, What's the status of Py2App and the new universal build. I'd like to start making packages for it, but I"d really like bdist_mpkg. Or should I figure out how to make binary eggs instead? By the way, is it possible to have the new universal build co-exist with the 2.4.1 framework build? At

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

> > Could someone please put a note on http://pythonmac.org/packages/ to > > say that the packages listed there are all PPC-only? > > Done Looks good, thanks. Bill ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51

>From: Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: pythonmac-sig@python.org >Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Installing numpy 0.9.6 problems >Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:50:33 -0800 >Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> I'd prefer to have 1 installer for python on OSX, that makes >> support a lot easier. >And

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:00:07PM -0800, Christopher Barker wrote: > What happens if you double-click on a *.egg? That'd be an incredibly cool utility to have, and a lot easier to write than something like PackageManager. -- Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

Bob Ippolito wrote: > No, I mean that that URL won't directly list any packages. It'll be a > listing of package lists and enough information to direct a newish user > to the right list. Then yes, that's a great idea. I am, as we e-speak, reworking those pages with a different structure now.

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> That whole section really needs to be restructured to address the >> common questions and issues people have regarding finding the right >> packages for them. > > great idea. > >> I think I'd like to turn http://pyt

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

Bob Ippolito wrote: > That whole section really needs to be restructured to address the > common questions and issues people have regarding finding the right > packages for them. great idea. > I think I'd like to turn http://pythonmac.org/ > packages/ into just a launch pad for finding a li

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

On Mar 27, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Bill Janssen wrote: > I'm looking over the downloads page again, thinking about what we need > to do to support the Universal builds. > > First off, the discussion last week about which packages will work > with it seems very important. > > Who's got edit access to p

[Pythonmac-SIG] Marking the pre-built extensions as Intel-capable...

I'm looking over the downloads page again, thinking about what we need to do to support the Universal builds. First off, the discussion last week about which packages will work with it seems very important. Who's got edit access to pythonmac.org? Could someone please put a note on http://pythonm

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [ann] Appscript Installer 1.3 released

I've added a link in the Wiki page about alternate distribution pointing to Ronald's 2.4.2 installer. Bill ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [ann] Appscript Installer 1.3 released

Ronald Oussoren wrote: > wxPython definitely works, I've tested it. That is, if you are on > a PPC box. The existing wxPython binary installer installs a PPC binary, > that won't work with a universal build on intel. That's good to know,but we really do need to get a Universal build of wxPython

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Installing numpy 0.9.6 problems

Ronald Oussoren wrote: > I'd prefer to have 1 installer for python on OSX, that makes support > a lot easier. And we would like to by able to use Py2App to build apps that will run under both 10.3.9 and 10.4.* -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer

[Pythonmac-SIG] Python 2.4.3c1 universal binaries

I have a universal build of the Python 2.4.3c1 release in the public folder of my idisk (at http://homepage.mac.com/ronaldoussoren). This passes the unittests on OSX 10.4 (both intel and ppc). I haven't tested it with 10.3.9 yet. This also solves the problems Nicolas Cole was having w.r.t.

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Problems installing Numpy using Universal MacPython

Ronald Oussoren wrote: > On 27-mrt-2006, at 18:00, James Boyle wrote: > > >>I posted this to the numpy mailing list - I am re-posting here >>since it is a more complete description of the situation than my >>previous post to this list. >> >>I am running OX 10.3.9. I installed python 2.4.2 usi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Problems installing Numpy using Universal MacPython

On 27-mrt-2006, at 18:00, James Boyle wrote: > I posted this to the numpy mailing list - I am re-posting here > since it is a more complete description of the situation than my > previous post to this list. > > I am running OX 10.3.9. I installed python 2.4.2 using Universal > MacPython 2.4

[Pythonmac-SIG] Problems installing Numpy using Universal MacPython

I posted this to the numpy mailing list - I am re-posting here since it is a more complete description of the situation than my previous post to this list. I am running OX 10.3.9. I installed python 2.4.2 using Universal MacPython 2.4.2.dmg. I am on a PowerPC G4. The Universal build is designed t