On 11/1/06, Jacob Rus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
> > Well, as a point of reference.. I bought TextMate because it's nice to
> > use for demos and such.. but I still use Vim for writing Python code
> > and Emacs for writing Erlang code.
> >
> > I never could get hooked on TextM
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Well, as a point of reference.. I bought TextMate because it's nice to
> use for demos and such.. but I still use Vim for writing Python code
> and Emacs for writing Erlang code.
>
> I never could get hooked on TextMate, despite trying. It just isn't as
> convenient to use as
(In reference to the discussion of TextMate).
I'm also not hooked on TextMate. Yet. My main objection is that undo is
one-character-at-a-time, which I find utterly maddening for extensive
undo. I also find it a bit cluttered and clumsy in some ways, but would
be willing to overlook that to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, I think that IDLE under MacPython 2.5 is a perfectly usable little
editor. Ronald did a great job getting it tweaked to behave better as a
Mac application. I prefer IDLE to other environments for editing Python,
including Aquamacs and Komodo.
-
On Wednesday, November 01, 2006, at 09:20AM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>
>> I think at the very least, every Mac user who deals with any significant
>> amount of structured text or code owes it to themselves to download the
>> 30-day trial. I estimate within 2 weeks, you'll be
On 10/31/06, Jacob Rus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Barker wrote:
> > Jacob Rus wrote:
> >> Admittedly, the python bundle is not as polished
> >> as those for some other languages (html and ruby for instance), but it
> >> is still head and shoulders above all the other editors listed ab
