Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Robert Kern
David Warde-Farley wrote: > On 11-Jan-07, at 11:18 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > >> Well, it's linking just fine, but vecLib removed the ATLAS version >> information >> that the scipy build system uses to determine whether or not to >> build the >> wrappers for the C versions of the BLAS subroutine

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 11-Jan-07, at 11:18 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > Well, it's linking just fine, but vecLib removed the ATLAS version > information > that the scipy build system uses to determine whether or not to > build the > wrappers for the C versions of the BLAS subroutines that ATLAS and > vecLib > provi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Robert Kern
David Warde-Farley wrote: > On 11-Jan-07, at 8:29 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> Well I'm back in the country now and I just got my mbp back from >> applecare today... so if "someone" sends me updated binaries I'll >> gladly sync them to pythonmac.org. > > I would do it but again, I'm not sure my b

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 11-Jan-07, at 8:29 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: > Well I'm back in the country now and I just got my mbp back from > applecare today... so if "someone" sends me updated binaries I'll > gladly sync them to pythonmac.org. I would do it but again, I'm not sure my binaries are "good" i.e. completely

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Nicholas Riley
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:21:27PM -0600, Nicholas Riley wrote: > It is really rather tiresome to read about people asking for "someone" > to do something when everyone's doing this work for free. I apologize for this message - I misread and overreacted. There's a dictum about counting to 3 befor

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 1/11/07, Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:21:19PM -0800, Christopher Barker wrote: > > Is it that hard to make a binary to put up (OK, two - one for PPC, one > > for Intel), once you've gotten it all built? At least a few people have > > gotten it going rece

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Nicholas Riley
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:21:19PM -0800, Christopher Barker wrote: > Is it that hard to make a binary to put up (OK, two - one for PPC, one > for Intel), once you've gotten it all built? At least a few people have > gotten it going recently. Could someone please make them available? How about p

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread belinda thom
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > > By the way, my idea of a working system is: > > python 2.5 (I'm still on 2.4, but if someone is putting effort in, > they > might as well do the latest) > > latest numpy > latest matplotlib > latest wxPython > > All working together! A

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Christopher Barker
David Warde-Farley wrote: > I think this means that the Universal scipy binaries offered on > pythonmac.org are quite broken. Yes, they are -- or at least very limited. Is it that hard to make a binary to put up (OK, two - one for PPC, one for Intel), once you've gotten it all built? At leas

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 11-Jan-07, at 12:13 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > With Universal Python 2.4, you need to be using gcc 4 and gfortran. > Please see > the instructions that I wrote here: > > http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2007-January/ > 025368.html > > If that doesn't solve the problem, tr

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread Robert Kern
David Warde-Farley wrote: > When I compile Numpy & Scipy from source (on a G5 running 10.4.8) I > run into these sorts of snags: > > >>> from scipy import sparse > Traceback (most recent call last): >File "", line 1, in ? >File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/ >

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread David Warde-Farley
I should point out that I just installed the distributed fat binaries after installing the absolute latest Universal Python, and I still get this error. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/ python2.4/site-packages$ python Python 2.4.4 (#1, Oct 18 2006, 10:3

[Pythonmac-SIG] Compiling Scipy/available binaries for Universal Python 2.4?

2007-01-11 Thread David Warde-Farley
When I compile Numpy & Scipy from source (on a G5 running 10.4.8) I run into these sorts of snags: >>> from scipy import sparse Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/lib/ python2.4/site-packages/scipy/sparse/__ini