On 17 Jun, 2007, at 20:06, Kevin Walzer wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
As was mentioned in the keynote, Leopard will by 4-way universal
throughout except for some exceptions. This means that 32-bit
builds for applications will run on all Leopard machines, there
are no seperate Leopard bui
On 17-Jun-2007, at 20:06 , Kevin Walzer wrote:
OK, I guess this means that 32-bit isn't going away any time soon. The
Carbon-dev list seems to think that this announcement means Carbon is
going the way of Classic. At least some of the people on that list say
that they will drop Mac support rath
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> As was mentioned in the keynote, Leopard will by 4-way universal
> throughout except for some exceptions. This means that 32-bit builds for
> applications will run on all Leopard machines, there are no seperate
> Leopard builds for 32-bit and 64-bit machines. This in
On 17-Jun-07, at 9:26 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Speaking of PyObjC: I'm working on a new major release of PyObjC.
> The code is not yet available in the public repository because I'm
> targetting Leopard (with a backward compatibility layer for Tiger
> and Panther) and didn't want to have
On 17 Jun, 2007, at 17:57, Kevin Walzer wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 14 Jun, 2007, at 22:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
However, if was nice to have some stuff without an
just to wrap this up, my problem had to do with having llvm binaries
in my path, I don't know why it came with a i686-darwin...-gcc4.0.0
and that probably conflicted with the real gcc.
Em 15/06/2007, às 18:03, Leonardo Santagada escreveu:
> I read the archives of the list, but I have XCode an
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 14 Jun, 2007, at 22:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
However, if was nice to have some stuff without any external
dependencies --
On 14 Jun, 2007, at 22:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
However, if was nice to have some stuff without any external
dependencies -- is there a lightweight way to do just Easy Di
