Thanks for your reply Ronald.
I do run multiple versions, but I change the symlink of Current.
Do you mean because people change versions in other ways, say through
a shell alias rather than change the symlink?
I can see that the sys.prefix approach is safer.
thanks,
David
On 06/11/2007, at 1:37
Shared libraries and environments (such as python) that are used
system wide are good candidates for "frameworkization". Wil was saying
that private frameworks should probably be avoided.
Ian
On Nov 5, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Nehemiah Dacres wrote:
> I am not sure how Virtualenv works or why it's
I am not sure how Virtualenv works or why it's not working but you make the
statement
>> Frameworks are IMHO a great idea.
lets not be idiosyncratic here. Frameworks (if you mean *.framework
packages) are only used by apple because they are cumbersome to use unless
you are developing multiple app
On Nov 5, 2007 10:10 AM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's partially because there's a large set of developers that only
> test on Linux and then assume code will work everywhere :-/
I'm guilty of that in reverse. I only test on OS X and let Linux
users fend for themselves until
On 5 Nov, 2007, at 19:09, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Frameworks are IMHO a great idea.
I agree, it's just that we need to port everything else to work with
them - it gets tedious.
That's partially because there's a large set of developers that only
test on Linux
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Frameworks are IMHO a great idea.
I agree, it's just that we need to port everything else to work with
them - it gets tedious.
> The problems with virtualenv are probably shallow,
Let's hope so.
That comment was born of frustration from another project (GDAL) --
appa
On 5 Nov, 2007, at 18:08, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Virtualenv almost but not quite works on OSX.
Well, darn.
I think Frameworks are a great idea, but as no one but Apple uses
them,
I"m really starting to think that they are not worth the effort.
Sometimes, "think
Ian Baird wrote:
> On x86-64, you get more GPRs. From my naive benchmarking with my
> algorithms on ObjC, I get at 15%-20% speedup.
Since I had to google it -- GPR == "General Purpose Register"
OK, 15-20% is nice!
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Virtualenv almost but not quite works on OSX.
Well, darn.
I think Frameworks are a great idea, but as no one but Apple uses them,
I"m really starting to think that they are not worth the effort.
Sometimes, "thinking different" isn't such a great idea.
Oh well,
-Chris
On x86-64, you get more GPRs. From my naive benchmarking with my
algorithms on ObjC, I get at 15%-20% speedup.
Ian
On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> semi OT:
>
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> It's to bad that they don't ship 64-bit command-line utilities as
>> well.
>
>
semi OT:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> It's to bad that they don't ship 64-bit command-line utilities as well.
What does 64-bit buy you? Is the only advantage the ability to address a
lot of memory? Any other performance advantages?
i.e. -- how much should I care?
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker
On 5 Nov, 2007, at 3:51, David Worrall wrote:
Hi All,
We're doing some work around different versions of Python on OSX (and
what's in their respective site-packages directory),
and I was wondering:
Given that we can pick up the the version number of the current
instantiation using sys.version
12 matches
Mail list logo
