On 11 Apr, 2008, at 1:22, Ian Bloom wrote:
I have a program that I've been writing using Xcode,
pyObjc and py2app. Up until this point I've been using
the standard python on Mac OSX Tiger which is 2.3,
it's been doing fine for me. I needed to use the
subprocess module, so I installed
2.4 and cha
Folks,
The removal of the Carbon bindings shouldn't impact the functionality
of the rest of the standard library. This means we need to do some
work though, because urllib relies on the Carbon bindings to get the
current proxy settings.
The best way to fix that (IMO of course) is to writ
On 10 Apr 2008, at 12:00, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Kevin Horton wrote:
>> I have stopped knocking my head against the wall with trying to
>> find a way to start this wxpython script by a double click.
>
> Did you try (and fail) py2app? That really is THE way to build a
> clickable app from
I have a program that I've been writing using Xcode,
pyObjc and py2app. Up until this point I've been using
the standard python on Mac OSX Tiger which is 2.3,
it's been doing fine for me. I needed to use the
subprocess module, so I installed
2.4 and changed the lead line in my setup.py file to
read
> > cd libpng-*
>
> The PIL docs state that you need libz for png support, but not libpng
> itself -- are those docs out of date?
I'm not sure. But I build it anyway for Ghostscript.
> > setenv CPPFLAGS "-I${distdir}/include"
> > setenv LDFLAGS "-L${distdir}/lib"
> > setenv CXXFLAGS "-I${distd
Bill Janssen wrote:
>>> Not really, you'll have to provide two installers.
>> Darn.
>
> I find that hard to believe. Why not two packages in the same
> installer with a preflight script that checks to see which to unpack?
OK. it's a terminology issue -- What I meant was "two separate
binaries".
Christopher Barker wrote:
> py2app would have done that, though I'm still confused as to why
> pythonlauncher didn't work for you.
Pythonlauncher is broken on Leopard:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1905
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
__
Kevin Horton wrote:
> I have stopped knocking my head against the wall with trying to find
> a way to start this wxpython script by a double click.
Did you try (and fail) py2app? That really is THE way to build a
clickable app from a python script.
> It would have been nice to get
> this wor
On 10 Apr, 2008, at 11:46, has wrote:
On 9 Apr 2008, at 06:56, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 3 Apr, 2008, at 15:46, has wrote:
it would be nice to have complete bindings to the bits of
Carbon that still make sense.
Yes, although I'd repeat my earlier suggestion that the most
economically via
On 6 Apr 2008, at 20:50, Kevin Horton wrote:
> What are the simplest ways to make a double-clickable interface to a
> wxpython application? I don't need to actually include python or
> wxpython in the application, as they are already resident on her
> computer.
I have stopped knocking my head aga
On 9 Apr 2008, at 06:56, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 3 Apr, 2008, at 15:46, has wrote:
>>
>>> it would be nice to have complete bindings to the bits of
>>> Carbon that still make sense.
>>
>> Yes, although I'd repeat my earlier suggestion that the most
>> economically viable way to provide Carb
11 matches
Mail list logo
