Oops. Right, I meant 'not much traffic', the "not" got removed while
editing :-(
Ronald
On 29 May, 2008, at 19:44, Orestis Markou wrote:
Surely you mean there ISN'T much traffic on the pyobjc-dev?
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On 28 May, 200
On May 29, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Boyd Waters wrote:
On May 29, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
I have the latest Mac Pro with 10.5.3. I ran the sys.maxint test
and got the 32-bit result. I tried both the Apple python and the
MacPorts python 2.5.2.
The MacPorts 2.5.2 doesn't have my 6
On May 29, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Georg wrote:
I am trying to build a data structure in Python which exceeds 4GB in
size (I have 10GB of RAM) and python exits with the following error
when it hits 4GB:
Python(23121) malloc: *** vm_allocate(size=262144) failed (error
code=3)
Python(23121) mal
On May 29, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Georg wrote:
My hope is that Leopard ships with a 64-bit version of Python, so
that I can at least fill up the 10GB of RAM that I have.
Nope... because Tcl/Tk isn't 64-bit!
But I've got a MacPorts port that builds a quad-architecture Python. I
wonder if that w
I¹ve been successfully using parallel python with a framework build of
python 2.5.2 on an 8-core Mac Pro. After upgrading to OS X 10.5.3 yesterday
my program quit working and the traceback indicated that it failed within
PIL. However, my code does not import PIL and I don¹t believe that parallel
Thanks for the responses,
I am trying to build a data structure in Python which exceeds 4GB in size (I
have 10GB of RAM) and python exits with the following error when it hits 4GB:
Python(23121) malloc: *** vm_allocate(size=262144) failed (error code=3)
Python(23121) malloc: *** error: can't all
Surely you mean there ISN'T much traffic on the pyobjc-dev?
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 28 May, 2008, at 23:03, Jack Jansen wrote:
>
> Now that pyobjc is a first-class citizen of MacPython, is there any
>> reason to maintain two mailing list
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Python under OS X 10.4 on a MacPro, and I'm running up against
> the limitations of a 32 bit address space (i.e., I can't use more than 4gb
> of space). I have 64 bit processors in my machine -- will upgra
Jack Jansen wrote:
Now that pyobjc is a first-class citizen of MacPython, is there any
reason to maintain two mailing lists? Are there any people who are
on one of the lists and not the other?
+1 for combining them into a single list.
I'm not on the PyObjC list, but only because I've not h
Hello,
I'm running Python under OS X 10.4 on a MacPro, and I'm running up against the
limitations of a 32 bit address space (i.e., I can't use more than 4gb of
space). I have 64 bit processors in my machine -- will upgrading to Leopard
allow Python to use a 64 bit address space?
sorry if thi
On 28 May, 2008, at 23:03, Jack Jansen wrote:
Now that pyobjc is a first-class citizen of MacPython, is there any
reason to maintain two mailing lists? Are there any people who are on
one of the lists and not the other?
I'm on both lists and wouldn't mind closing down the pyobjc-dev list.
Hello,
I recently started using Shed Skin, which is a Python-to-C++ compiler. It works
great. On the functions I converted, I got an 18X speedup.
However, at the time I did that work I was running the Python Apple supplies
with Leopard. Last week I installed MacPython 2.5.2. Now, whenever I try
12 matches
Mail list logo