The fix I have working for this now is to use a symbolic link to the
directory where I keep my scripts.
Not quite as clean as just using the script name, but certainly better
than typing out a long direct path.
I see what you are saying. It didn't occur to me that Python would
not use an
I see what you are saying. It didn't occur to me that Python would not
use any of those variables, not even $PYTHONPATH. Thank you for
pointing that out.
I suppose the next best strategy should be to look into using a
terminal shortcut to at least make the "cd" to the directory a bit
less
Pascal Bompard wrote:
Yes, I am aware that I could do that. I chose to only demonstrate the
full path method rather than both ways to access the file in my example.
The problem remains though, that every time I want to run a script in
that directory, I'd have to type out the entire path, which
Yes, I am aware that I could do that. I chose to only demonstrate the
full path method rather than both ways to access the file in my example.
The problem remains though, that every time I want to run a script in
that directory, I'd have to type out the entire path, which is not
ideal.
Su
Pascal Bompard wrote:
I will include some terminal output below to help with diagnostics:
Successful attempt:
pascal$ python /Users/pascal/Documents/Python/Dev/myapps/test.py
Unsuccessful attempt:
pascal$ python
The problem I am experiencing is that I can run a Python script
successfully if I use the full path to the script, but I can't run it
otherwise.
I have checked and set my $PATH as well as $PYTHONPATH to be correct.
Also, the sys.path has a correct reference. I have also confirmed that
per
Hi,
My application depends on Python and wxPython. I am creating a .app-
file with py2app under Leopard. Python 2.5.2 and wxPython 2.8.8.0.
The file size of the app is 90 MB for "python setup.py py2app":
Frameworks/libwx_macud-2.8.0.dylib is 21 MB
Frameworks/Python.framework is 5 MB
Resources/
