On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Reza Lotun wrote:
Hi,
As an addendum to that, what is the current status of trying to
build Pyobjc 2.0 for Python 2.6? I tried a few weeks ago but it
didn't seem to work - is it at all possible?
Yes, it is possible. I haven't tried building it against the
py
> I want to install 3.0 to experiment with all the new features, but I
> don't want to do anything horrible to my default Leopard install, and
> I'd like to be able to remove 3.0 easily. What's the most sensible
> way of doing this? Setting a --prefix of /opt/python3.0 , for
> example, or just us
Sorry if this gets double-posted. I sent from the wrong address
initially and now it seems it will never return from moderator-limbo.
On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Reza Lotun wrote:
Hi,
As an addendum to that, what is the current status of trying to
build Pyobjc 2.0 for Python 2.6? I tried
On 17-Dec-08, at 1:25 PM, Dav Clark wrote:
Reza,
Are you implying that you are able to build pyobjc 2.0 on python
2.5? No one I know is able to do this... it would be exceedingly
useful to have instructions on how to do this. Even vague and
cryptic hints would be appreciated!
I post
Reza,
Are you implying that you are able to build pyobjc 2.0 on python 2.5?
No one I know is able to do this... it would be exceedingly useful to
have instructions on how to do this. Even vague and cryptic hints
would be appreciated!
I posted a good while ago about this, and occasional
Hi,
As an addendum to that, what is the current status of trying to build Pyobjc
2.0 for Python 2.6? I tried a few weeks ago but it didn't seem to work - is
it at all possible?
Thanks,
Reza
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed today that while PyO
Hi folks,
I noticed today that while PyObjC, etc. is included in the system
Python in 10.5, the py2.5-fat binaries on undefined.org are 1.4.x
series. As I understood it, the python.org UB is the only solution if
you want to build redistributable applications. I also have been using
it as
