On 24 Feb, 2011, at 10:16, has wrote:
>
>
>> The BridgeSupport project is a mess, the specification is too lax to be
>> useful.
>
> Not the first time I've heard this criticism, but there are enough
> bridge and runtime developers around these days that they ought to be
> able to pull togethe
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>> Unbelievable. Apple's "scripting bridge" push,
>>
>> You mean BridgeSupport
>
> There's also the Cocoa Scripting Bridge
Folks often use 'scripting bridge' to mean 'scripting language to ObjC
bridge' (PyObjC, RubyCocoa, etc). The misleadingly named Scripting
Bridge is Ap
