On May 27, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 27-mei-2006, at 18:34, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>
>> The trunk builds fine for me, as does 1.3.7. I wonder why it
>> failed for him.
>
> Arghh, I wrote too soon, 1.3.7 doesn't build after all. I hadden't
> expected a failure in the f
On May 27, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>> So a guy on the Italian Mac newsgroup (it.comp.lang.macintosh) went
>> to the trouble of downloading and installing the new XCode 2.3 --
>> almost a GB downloa
So a guy on the Italian Mac newsgroup (it.comp.lang.macintosh) went
to the trouble of downloading and installing the new XCode 2.3 --
almost a GB download!!! -- and now says PyObjC doesn't compile any
more (so he's reverted XCode to 2.2.1). Unfortunately he didn't copy-
and-paste the error
On Apr 26, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
> Alex,
> Just so you and anyone who cares that our platform get fair
> treatment know. Turns out the Mac bigot was behaving badly again.
> GMP 4.2 doesn't compile on PPC macs either and he was blaming
> Apple's compilers. Turns out we figured
On Apr 22, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
> cc -arch ppc -arch i386 -Wl,-syslibroot,/Developer/SDKs/
> MacOSX10.4u.sdk -o static static.o -L. -lanswer
...
> /usr/bin/ld: for architecture ppc
> /usr/bin/ld: warning static.o cputype (7, architecture i386) does
> not match cputyp
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
...
> On other platforms I'd say that gmp should be compiled with -fPIC
> in the compiler flags. On OSX however this
That's one of the things I tried (adding CFLAGS=-fPIC to the ./
configure invocation), uselessly.
> should be the defaul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
> So the answer, IMHO and I could be wrong since I am very new to
> this, is one of two choices:
> 1) use 'ld' to produce two separate builds and then use 'lipo' to
> weld them together as a 'FAT' dylib or
> 2) To use 'cc' to build the dy
On Apr 22, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
>> Apple's assembly syntax is totally irrelevant here. The reason make
>> check fails is Apple's creative *ld semantics*: an object file inside
>> a library file is NOT brought in if the only symbols it satisfies are
>> DATA ones.
...
>
On Apr 22, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
> A new edition of the Nutshell? That is great news! That's the book
> I go back to, out of a dozen I've got, most often. Updated for 2.5
> perhaps?
Focused on 2.4 (and pointing out what 2.4 added to 2.3, so that by
subtraction it should
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No arbitrary precison math on Mac-tel say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
> The analog of a single gene pool in nature has come to pass for
> arbitrary precison math (APM) for OS X (native not Python).
> GMP is 'it' for APM as far as I can t
I'm wondering about comparative performance -- shouldn't a Macbook
Pro 2.0 GHz be VASTLY faster than a humble iBook G4 12" (1.33 GHz PPC
G4)?
And yet, pybench 1.0 tells me: 7806 ms on the iBook, 7721 on the
Macbook; also, the iBook measures at 22026 pystones/sec, the Macbook
at 22624. Tha
> Without any experience with "eggs" (I believe that they are another
> Phillip Eby brainstorm?), can I suggest that a standard command-line
Yep, they are.
> Is there a specification for the "egg" format?
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs
They're zipfiles containing additional
12 matches
Mail list logo
