Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 64-bit code

2007-06-17 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 17 Jun, 2007, at 20:06, Kevin Walzer wrote: Ronald Oussoren wrote: As was mentioned in the keynote, Leopard will by 4-way universal throughout except for some exceptions. This means that 32-bit builds for applications will run on all Leopard machines, there are no seperate Leopard bui

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 64-bit code

2007-06-17 Thread Jack Jansen
On 17-Jun-2007, at 20:06 , Kevin Walzer wrote: OK, I guess this means that 32-bit isn't going away any time soon. The Carbon-dev list seems to think that this announcement means Carbon is going the way of Classic. At least some of the people on that list say that they will drop Mac support rath

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 64-bit code

2007-06-17 Thread Kevin Walzer
Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > As was mentioned in the keynote, Leopard will by 4-way universal > throughout except for some exceptions. This means that 32-bit builds for > applications will run on all Leopard machines, there are no seperate > Leopard builds for 32-bit and 64-bit machines. This in

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 64-bit code

2007-06-17 Thread Dethe Elza
On 17-Jun-07, at 9:26 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > Speaking of PyObjC: I'm working on a new major release of PyObjC. > The code is not yet available in the public repository because I'm > targetting Leopard (with a backward compatibility layer for Tiger > and Panther) and didn't want to have

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] 64-bit code

2007-06-17 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 17 Jun, 2007, at 17:57, Kevin Walzer wrote: Ronald Oussoren wrote: On 14 Jun, 2007, at 22:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote: On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote: However, if was nice to have some stuff without an