On 31 Dec 2007, at 14:09, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
[cc.d to Bob for his info]
>>> That's a buglet in Python, fixed in what will be 2.5.2. Apple's
>>> python doesn't do universal binaries and setuptools doesn't know
>>> that an 'fat' egg will do on a 'ppc' or 'i386' platform.
After further poki
On 31 Dec, 2007, at 14:43, has wrote:
(Profuse apologies for the late reply...)
On 23 Dec 2007, at 15:23, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
1. Any ideas on why it's selecting the .tar.gz version rather than
the .egg? (Note: the egg was built using my own Python 2.5
installation, rather than the Apple o
(Profuse apologies for the late reply...)
On 23 Dec 2007, at 15:23, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> 1. Any ideas on why it's selecting the .tar.gz version rather than
>> the .egg? (Note: the egg was built using my own Python 2.5
>> installation, rather than the Apple one.)
>
> That's a buglet in Python
Has,
On 21 Dec, 2007, at 22:37, has wrote:
Hi all,
Just ran into the following problem when trying to install appscript
0.18.0 into Leopard's default Python installation via easy_install
(setuptools 0.6c3):
has$ /usr/bin/easy_install appscript
Searching for appscript
Reading http://pypi.pytho
Hi all,
Just ran into the following problem when trying to install appscript
0.18.0 into Leopard's default Python installation via easy_install
(setuptools 0.6c3):
has$ /usr/bin/easy_install appscript
Searching for appscript
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/appscript/
Reading http://apps
