On Jul 20, 2005, at 7:10 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 20-jul-2005, at 16:33, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>
>
>> On 7/20/05, Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Jul 2005, at 13:36, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>>>
>>>
That is more comforting than going with the Darwin version. I'
On 7/20/05, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't mention the implementation of macosx_vers, but instead of
> calling /usr/bin/sw_vers you could also use platform.mac_ver,
> something like:
Ahh, I didn't know about that. macosx_vers is basically the sw_vers
function that Bob point
On 20-jul-2005, at 16:33, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> On 7/20/05, Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 20 Jul 2005, at 13:36, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>>
>>> That is more comforting than going with the Darwin version. I'll
>>> wrap
>>> that up for Phillip and send him a patch.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
On 7/20/05, Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2005, at 13:36, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> > That is more comforting than going with the Darwin version. I'll wrap
> > that up for Phillip and send him a patch.
>
>
> Note that the 3 or 4 people in the world running (pure) Darwin
> sy
On 20 Jul 2005, at 13:36, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> On 7/19/05, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Pick out the sw_vers function from here:
>> http://svn.red-bean.com/bob/py2app/trunk/src/bdist_mpkg/tools.py
>>
>
> That is more comforting than going with the Darwin version. I'll wrap
> tha
On 7/19/05, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pick out the sw_vers function from here:
> http://svn.red-bean.com/bob/py2app/trunk/src/bdist_mpkg/tools.py
That is more comforting than going with the Darwin version. I'll wrap
that up for Phillip and send him a patch.
Kevin
_
On Jul 19, 2005, at 4:56 AM, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> I have been packaging up some of my python packages in eggs:
> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs
>
> Basically, an egg has everything you need to use a package,
> ready-to-run... including binary versions of extensions. It's a n
On 19-jul-2005, at 16:56, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>
> That's where I need some help, because I don't know for certain what
> the compatibility rules are. From reading this list for the past
> several months, I have an idea:
>
> 1) an extension built for Python 2.4 on 10.3 should work under 10.4
> 2)
I have been packaging up some of my python packages in eggs:
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs
Basically, an egg has everything you need to use a package,
ready-to-run... including binary versions of extensions. It's a nice
format because it enables people to just run an "easy_ins
