Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1 Apr, 2008, at 22:09, has wrote: On 1 Apr 2008, at 19:03, Kevin Walzer wrote: What does the "de-Macification" in Python 3.0 mean? Will the Carbon modules be removed? I've found the answer to my own question: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ Yuk. Looks like I will have to remove

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1 Apr, 2008, at 17:37, Kevin Walzer wrote: has wrote: With the general de-Macification of Python 3.0 being planned, I wonder if the python3.0 interpreter should take the same approach, leaving it up to individual modules to decide if and when they want a GUI connection? Anyone any tho

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread has
On 1 Apr 2008, at 19:03, Kevin Walzer wrote: >> What does the "de-Macification" in Python 3.0 mean? Will the Carbon >> modules be removed? > > I've found the answer to my own question: > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ > > Yuk. Looks like I will have to remove the Carbon bits from my

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread has
On 1 Apr 2008, at 16:22, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> With the general de-Macification of Python 3.0 being planned, I >> wonder >> if the python3.0 interpreter should take the same approach, leaving >> it >> up to individual modules to decide if and when they want a GUI >> connection? Anyone any

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread has
On 1 Apr 2008, at 16:37, Kevin Walzer wrote: > What does the "de-Macification" in Python 3.0 mean? Will the Carbon > modules be removed? See: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ I'm totally for their removal from the 3.0 stdlib, btw. They did their job in the day, but they've

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread Kevin Walzer
Kevin Walzer wrote: > > What does the "de-Macification" in Python 3.0 mean? Will the Carbon > modules be removed? > I've found the answer to my own question: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ Yuk. Looks like I will have to remove the Carbon bits from my app at some point! -- Kevin W

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread Kevin Walzer
has wrote: > > With the general de-Macification of Python 3.0 being planned, I wonder > if the python3.0 interpreter should take the same approach, leaving it > up to individual modules to decide if and when they want a GUI > connection? Anyone any thoughts? What does the "de-Macification"

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1 Apr, 2008, at 14:23, has wrote: On 1 Apr 2008, at 13:19, has wrote: The command line python interpreter automatically upgrades to a full GUI process whenever OS APIs linked to the Window Manager are called. [...] As an addendum: Note that this isn't an issue with Ruby as the ruby inte

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-01 Thread has
On 1 Apr 2008, at 13:19, has wrote: > The command line python interpreter automatically upgrades to a full > GUI process whenever OS APIs linked to the Window Manager are > called. [...] As an addendum: Note that this isn't an issue with Ruby as the ruby interpreter only upgrades to a GUI

[Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon (was: Re: Sending files to the trash)

2008-04-01 Thread has
On 29 Mar 2008, at 09:11, Alex MacCaw wrote: > Thanks - that works. > I'm wondering how to get rid of the python rocket ship that appears > in the dock when I start sending applescript events. I've tried > deleting the object reference to app('Finder') but to no avail. The command line pytho