At 11:48 AM 2/7/2006 -0800, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:37 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>I've implemented a similar - but different - patch. Yours causes
>>setuptools' tests to fail on non-Mac platforms, including non-Mac
>>darwin.
>
>Could you explain how? I don't see it. The condit
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:37 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 2/5/2006 -0800, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>> With the way that we're returning the distutils platform on the
>>> universal branch of Mac OS X, we need another patch to
>>> pkg_resources.
At 02:07 PM 2/5/2006 -0800, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>On Feb 5, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>With the way that we're returning the distutils platform on the
>>universal branch of Mac OS X, we need another patch to
>>pkg_resources. The reason for this is that
>>distutils.util.get_platform() r
On Feb 5, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
With the way that we're returning the distutils platform on the
universal branch of Mac OS X, we need another patch to
pkg_resources. The reason for this is that
distutils.util.get_platform() returns the platform that it is
trying to produ
With the way that we're returning the distutils platform on the
universal branch of Mac OS X, we need another patch to
pkg_resources. The reason for this is that
distutils.util.get_platform() returns the platform that it is trying
to produce binaries for, which is often not the exact curre
