On 24 Oct, 2009, at 15:23, Irmen de Jong wrote:
> Hamish Sanderson wrote:
>
>> Reading the docs. A few questions, if you don't mind:
>> - Will Pyro play well with PyObjC objects?
>
> I can't say anything about this, I have zero experience with PyObjC.
>
>> - How does it compare to, say, DO+Bon
Hamish Sanderson wrote:
Reading the docs. A few questions, if you don't mind:
- Will Pyro play well with PyObjC objects?
I can't say anything about this, I have zero experience with PyObjC.
- How does it compare to, say, DO+Bonjour (which is the only
object-oriented IPC system I'm vaguely f
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, at 01:20PM, "Hamish Sanderson" > wrote:
Trying to use Distributed Objects to communicate between PyObjC-based
processes on 10.5 and/or 10.6, but encountering various problems when
passing Python values, as illustrated below.
Full DO support
Hamish Sanderson wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to use Distributed Objects to communicate between PyObjC-based
processes on 10.5 and/or 10.6, but encountering various problems when
passing Python values, as illustrated below. The production code
currently only passes Python strings as arguments so I c
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, at 01:20PM, "Hamish Sanderson"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Trying to use Distributed Objects to communicate between PyObjC-based
>processes on 10.5 and/or 10.6, but encountering various problems when
>passing Python values, as illustrated below. The production code
>c
Hi all,
Trying to use Distributed Objects to communicate between PyObjC-based
processes on 10.5 and/or 10.6, but encountering various problems when
passing Python values, as illustrated below. The production code
currently only passes Python strings as arguments so I can work around
these
