On 28 Nov, 2009, at 21:00, Bill Janssen wrote:
> has wrote:
>
>> The bouncing Dock icon is gone when using appscript 0.21.0 on a version of
>> Python that was built against 10.5 or 10.6 SDKs. (Yay!)
>
> Yay! Now I can can my private copy of Python with the LSUIElement flag set...
>
>> Perha
Aahz wrote:
>> A couple of outstanding issues/omissions have been frustrating me
>> recently, namely the annoying bouncing Dock icon and the inability to
>> control multiple instances of the same app, so I've finally dealt with
>> those.
>
> Could you describe your experience with those two issues
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009, hengist.podd e-mail wrote:
>
> A couple of outstanding issues/omissions have been frustrating me
> recently, namely the annoying bouncing Dock icon and the inability to
> control multiple instances of the same app, so I've finally dealt with
> those.
Could you describe your
has wrote:
> The bouncing Dock icon is gone when using appscript 0.21.0 on a version of
> Python that was built against 10.5 or 10.6 SDKs. (Yay!)
Yay! Now I can can my private copy of Python with the LSUIElement flag set...
> Perhaps it's time python.org started distributing framework builds
All,
> One more thing: I've chucked a preliminary 0.21.0 into the svn trunk.
>
> A couple of outstanding issues/omissions have been frustrating me
> recently, namely the annoying bouncing Dock icon
I've noticed a caveat:
The bouncing Dock icon is gone when using appscript 0.21.0 on a version of
In article
,
"hengist.podd e-mail" wrote:
> OK, 10.5 seems to pack return IDs as typeSInt32 rather than
> typeSInt16. Shouldn't matter, except that there isn't a
> SInt32-to-SInt16 coercion handler installed so AEGetAttributePtr fails
> when I try to extract the newly created AppleEvent's return
Ned Deily wrote:
>> If any appscript users
>> here are willing to give it a workout (Python 2.3-3.1.1, 10.4-10.6, 32-bit
>> PPC/i386, x86-64) and let me know if everything's okay or if any issues are
>> still outstanding, I'd really appreciate it.
>
> I just had time to run a few quick install and
In article ,
Ned Deily wrote:
> Same results with the python.org 2.6.4 on this machine either via
> setuptools easy_install or direct python setup.py install.
Sorry, I overlooked the fact that the 2.6.4 traceback is a little more
informative (again on 10.5.8 PPC G4):
$ /usr/local/bin/python2.
In article <8773f3ac-0873-47f6-9587-07a1e114d...@virgin.net>,
has wrote:
> Just checked in rev. 69 which contains a couple of 64-bit bug fixes along
> with a workaround for OS 10.6's return ID bug. Unfortunately, I don't have
> time to do a thorough test, particularly of 32- and 64-bit support
