On 2-dec-04, at 23:09, Jack Jansen wrote:
On 2-dec-04, at 16:11, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Patch your config/Makefile of your existing Python 2.3.0 installation
(see a recent email of mine on the subject)
Here's an idea: could we somehow incorporate your patch into one of
the Python Makefiles (Mac/OSX/
On 3 Dec 2004, at 10:56, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
It would also be possible to monkey-patch the 2.3 install. IIRC I've
posted one way to do a long time ago. That message should be in the
archives.
The advantage would be that you do not have to patch files in /System,
we could even use this to ins
On 3-dec-04, at 15:23, Jack Jansen wrote:
On 3 Dec 2004, at 10:56, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
It would also be possible to monkey-patch the 2.3 install. IIRC I've
posted one way to do a long time ago. That message should be in the
archives.
The advantage would be that you do not have to patch files
On Dec 2, 2004, at 08:11, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Dec 2, 2004, at 10:00, Samuel M.Smith wrote:
Would anyone care to post step by step instructions for building a
framework version of Python 2.4
that will peacefully cohabitate with the built in OS X Python 2.3.
Does it build out of the box from th
On Dec 3, 2004, at 10:55, Samuel M. Smith wrote:
On Dec 2, 2004, at 08:11, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Dec 2, 2004, at 10:00, Samuel M.Smith wrote:
Would anyone care to post step by step instructions for building a
framework version of Python 2.4
that will peacefully cohabitate with the built in OS X
On Dec 3, 2004, at 10:55, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 3-dec-04, at 15:23, Jack Jansen wrote:
On 3 Dec 2004, at 10:56, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
It would also be possible to monkey-patch the 2.3 install. IIRC I've
posted one way to do a long time ago. That message should be in the
archives.
The advant
On 3-dec-2004, at 18:05, Bob Ippolito wrote:
It would be easier to just build a .pkg installer that has a preflight
script that checks for OS X 10.3.x, and does the patch.
Sure, but I like ugly hacks :-)
Ronald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
I just downloaded the latest versions of numarray and Numeric Python.
numarray builds and installs without problems, but Numeric fails -- it
seems to have a bad setup.py file that references missing directories
such as "/usr/include/atlas". Is there a set of patches for building
this on Panther ag
On Dec 3, 2004, at 14:01, Bill Janssen wrote:
I just downloaded the latest versions of numarray and Numeric Python.
numarray builds and installs without problems, but Numeric fails -- it
seems to have a bad setup.py file that references missing directories
such as "/usr/include/atlas". Is there a
Thanks, Bob.
Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
Bob Ippolito wrote:
(Bonus question: the Numeric Python documentation makes it clear that
numarray should be used, but not how. Is numarray a substitute for
all of Numeric? If not, should numarray be installed before NumPy?)
I think what they mean is that new applications should use numarray. I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone explain or point me to something to read about the
> benefits/trade-offs of using the framework version (I'm a long time
> Linux/Solaris user, but new to OS X) vs. just a regular compilation?
Framework python is
Thanks, Chris.
I'll work with numarray, then, since it just installs on my Macs. I
want to do a lot of document clustering in various ways, so I'm
building term vectors, etc. There doesn't seem to be anything in the
API specifically about that.
Bill
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
