[Pythonmac-SIG] portability problem with py2app-built app

Hi, Having a problem with a semi-standalone app built using py2app 0.1.7. Building it OMM (OS10.2.8, MacPython 2.3.3) and the app works fine here, but on the user's machine (OS10.3, standard Apple-installed MacPython) it shows a dialog saying that it requires Python 2.3. What's wrong? Thanks,

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] coding preference

So my point is, you may very well be advocating an approach which will marginalize the Mac platform even further. I know that's not your intent, your intent is to see excellent Mac apps get created, but by eschewing and not helping approaches like the one wxWidgets takes, and in fact by making

[Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

Hey all, Just reading up on Automator development and wondering if the MacPython community (or anyone in it) has any plans to 0wnz0r it yet? Like providing a 'Python Automator Action' template for Xcode, flogging a nice introductory 'Deve

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] portability problem with py2app-built app

On Jan 23, 2005, at 5:35 AM, has wrote: Having a problem with a semi-standalone app built using py2app 0.1.7. Building it OMM (OS10.2.8, MacPython 2.3.3) and the app works fine here, but on the user's machine (OS10.3, standard Apple-installed MacPython) it shows a dialog saying that it requi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On Jan 23, 2005, at 9:29, has wrote: Just reading up on Automator development and wondering if the MacPython community (or anyone in it) has any plans to 0wnz0r it yet? Like providing a 'Python Automator Action' template for Xcode, floggi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

Bob wrote: Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support. Cool. How hard would it be to provide casual users a more Pythonic, easy-to-use API over part or all of that, you think? Or would it be more sensible to wait

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] coding preference

I have to say I fall between the two positions. Writing applications that have some pedagogical component, as I often do, and finding that 90% of students can't run it because it runs only on Mac, gets really, really tiresome in the long run. (An old tutorial Hypercard stack is still waiting fo

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] portability problem with py2app-built app

Bob wrote: Having a problem with a semi-standalone app built using py2app 0.1.7. Building it OMM (OS10.2.8, MacPython 2.3.3) and the app works fine here, but on the user's machine (OS10.3, standard Apple-installed MacPython) it shows a dialog saying that it requires Python 2.3. What's wrong? N

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On Jan 23, 2005, at 10:52, has wrote: Bob wrote: Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support. Cool. How hard would it be to provide casual users a more Pythonic, easy-to-use API over part or all of that, you think?

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] portability problem with py2app-built app

On Jan 23, 2005, at 10:32, has wrote: Bob wrote: Having a problem with a semi-standalone app built using py2app 0.1.7. Building it OMM (OS10.2.8, MacPython 2.3.3) and the app works fine here, but on the user's machine (OS10.3, standard Apple-installed MacPython) it shows a dialog saying that it

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] coding preference

Hi Pete, On Jan 23, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Pete wrote: [snip] Personally I have a great application and I don't care about the 'market' - I don't owe them anything, especially the sheepish ones. My app' is currently very simple and I am going to continue developing it on the greatest client platform a

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On 23-jan-05, at 15:55, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Jan 23, 2005, at 9:29, has wrote: Just reading up on Automator development and wondering if the MacPython community (or anyone in it) has any plans to 0wnz0r it yet? Like providing a 'Python A

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] coding preference

On 22-jan-05, at 2:21, Kevin Ollivier wrote: Hi Jack, Hi Kevin! First: sorry for my bad choice of words. "throwaway apps" especially is not what I should have said, and some of the other words were badly chosen too. I definitely don't want to belittle the work you're doing with wxPython (and oth

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On Jan 23, 2005, at 17:28, Jack Jansen wrote: On 23-jan-05, at 15:55, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Jan 23, 2005, at 9:29, has wrote: Just reading up on Automator development and wondering if the MacPython community (or anyone in it) has any plans

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On 1/23/05 7:53 PM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator >>> Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support. I >>> doubt I'll be using Automator often enough to become a PyObjC >>> Automator evangelist though

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Python+Automator?

On Jan 24, 2005, at 0:10, Paul Berkowitz wrote: On 1/23/05 7:53 PM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support. I doubt I'll be using Automator often enough to become a PyO

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] coding preference

Hi Jack, On Jan 23, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Jack Jansen wrote: On 22-jan-05, at 2:21, Kevin Ollivier wrote: Hi Jack, Hi Kevin! First: sorry for my bad choice of words. "throwaway apps" especially is not what I should have said, and some of the other words were badly chosen too. I definitely don't want