Hi,
Does anyone here know how I can surpress the annoying feature for
aqua tk to open a tcl console window when stdin is an empty file.
This feature results in an additional window when opening IDLE.app...
If all else fails I'll implement an awful hack, but I'd like to find
the proper solut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone here know how I can surpress the annoying feature for
> aqua tk to open a tcl console window when stdin is an empty file.
> This feature results in an additional window when opening IDLE.app...
In Tcl,
On 19-mei-2006, at 16:12, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone here know how I can surpress the annoying feature for
>> aqua tk to open a tcl console window when stdin is an empty file.
>> This feature results in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> I'm going to replace my hack with this suggestion.
Glad that worked.
>
> Now that I have the attention of someone that actually knows something
> about tk :-)... This[1] document mentions I can implement support for
> op
On 19-mei-2006, at 18:26, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm going to replace my hack with this suggestion.
>
> Glad that worked.
>
>>
>> Now that I have the attention of someone that actually knows
>> something
>> about
On 19-mei-2006, at 18:26, Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
> You mentioned earlier about making IDLE more HIG-conformant. Is
> this the
> kind of stuff you had in mind?
Python patch #1491759 is the current state of my changes to IDLE.
Barring the minor issue of the general L&F of plain Tk and the
d
hello,
maybe somebody can help me with the following problem:
is there a way to retrieve the complete arguments that where given to
the (Mac)Python interpreter (from within the first script that gets
executed with it)?
i would like to receive the -psn_* argument that was given to the
pytho
On 20-mei-2006, at 3:44, Thorsten Kohnhorst wrote:
> hello,
>
> maybe somebody can help me with the following problem:
>
> is there a way to retrieve the complete arguments that where given to
> the (Mac)Python interpreter (from within the first script that gets
> executed with it)?
>
> i would l