Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Why Do I Explicitly Need MacPython

2006-09-21 Thread Christopher Barker
Robert Love wrote: > On Sep 20, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> A major conceptual difference between MacPorts/Fink and MacPython >> is that the the first two are projects to use unix software on the >> mac, while MacPython is more focused on fitting in with the OS. > > Here is the

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Why Do I Explicitly Need MacPython

2006-09-21 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 9/21/06, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Love wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >> A major conceptual difference between MacPorts/Fink and MacPython > >> is that the the first two are projects to use unix software on the > >> mac, while MacPy

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Why Do I Explicitly Need MacPython

2006-09-21 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >... > > I've started looking into that. However, my strong suspicion is that the > > way to build a MacPython installer that can use a user-installed Tcl/Tk > > is to *have* a user-installed Tcl/Tk installed before buil

[Pythonmac-SIG] Stackless on Python2.5 Universal Built - Passing Tests

2006-09-21 Thread Ian Baird
I've built stackless python for python 2.5 on my machine and it passes the unit tests. I had to update some of the assembler to get it to compile under gcc 4. Who should I submit my patche to and how should I package this up? I'm currently running the universal python build script to create an mpkg