Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Universal build bug - Undefined symbols and pythonmac?

2007-04-09 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 9 Apr, 2007, at 6:59, Bob Ippolito wrote: I'm pretty sure that 10.4 would fix this. 10.3.9 isn't really equipped to build extensions for a universal Python (it can only build the PPC part). It runs them fine, but it can't build stuff properly because the Xcode is too old. You can't build u

[Pythonmac-SIG] py2app: Adding additional frameworks to setup.py?

2007-04-09 Thread Zachery Bir
I might have missed it in the docs, but is there a way I can add frameworks to be bundled in the setup.py, rather than on the command line? Everything that has to get added explicitly on the command line is one more thing I'm likely to forget when releases don't happen every other day :^)

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] py2app: Adding additional frameworks to setup.py?

2007-04-09 Thread Zachery Bir
On Apr 9, 2007, at 8:48 AM, Zachery Bir wrote: > I might have missed it in the docs, but is there a way I can add > frameworks to be bundled in the setup.py, rather than on the command > line? Everything that has to get added explicitly on the command line > is one more thing I'm likely to forget

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Universal build bug - Undefined symbols and pythonmac?

2007-04-09 Thread David Pratt
Hi. Many thanks for your reply. I set environment var of MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to 10.3 but no change in situation unfortunately. I wonder if I should use mac ports version of python in the short term - it should build on the PPC alright but it does not seem up to date since I don't see a 2.4