Lyndsey Ferguson wrote:
>
> On 10/9/07, Nehemiah Dacres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> .so, if im not mistaken is eather a linux shared library or not a mac
>> shared library (someone correct me if im wrong) try making sure the
>> python
>> version you chose is the one for mac.
>
> Thank you
On Monday, November 19, 2007, at 10:05AM, "sparklight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>Lyndsey - I see your resolution to the -framework Carbon problem, I
>discovered that also. But I'm still groping for the solution to the
>"Inappropriate file type for dynamic loading" problem. My linker (gcc
On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:10 AM, sparklight wrote:
>
>
> Lyndsey Ferguson wrote:
>>
>> On 10/9/07, Nehemiah Dacres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> .so, if im not mistaken is eather a linux shared library or not a
>>> mac
>>> shared library (someone correct me if im wrong) try making sure the
>>>
Is anyone on this list using Eclipse with Python and the SWT
windowing kit?
I've been looking through the MacPython.org and Eclipse pages for
info on combining Python and SWT. So far, I've read about the PyDev
plugin that allows Eclipse to speak Python.
I'd like to know if PyDev would all
Em 19/11/2007, às 17:50, Scott Frankel escreveu:
> Is anyone on this list using Eclipse with Python and the SWT
> windowing kit?
>
> I've been looking through the MacPython.org and Eclipse pages for
> info on combining Python and SWT. So far, I've read about the PyDev
> plugin that allows Eclipse
Scott Frankel wrote:
> Is anyone on this list using Eclipse with Python and the SWT
> windowing kit?
>
> I've been looking through the MacPython.org and Eclipse pages for
> info on combining Python and SWT. So far, I've read about the PyDev
> plugin that allows Eclipse to speak Python.
>
>
I've had good experience with wxpython. In some areas the documentation can
be a little spotty, but it's generally pretty easy to figure out.
I've had a few quirks with PyDev though. I found it difficult to get it to
recognize where my site-packages directory was, despite the fact that the
binar
On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Scott Frankel wrote:
> Ultimately, I'm looking for a windowing toolkit that uses native
> widgets, one that can provide a high level of visual polish, that can
> be built for multiple OS's and platforms, and that plays nicely with
> Python.
Sounds like you're
Thanks for the suggestions (and warnings!).
Would Idle be a good choice for IDE if I were to use wx? I've seen
Python plugins for XCode. Would that support debugging?
Thanks again!
Scott
On Nov 19, 2007, at 1:03 PM, James Kelly wrote:
> I've had good experience with wxpython. In some a
Am 2007-11-19 um 21:56 schrieb Ed Leafe:
> On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Scott Frankel wrote:
>> Ultimately, I'm looking for a windowing toolkit that uses native
>> widgets, one that can provide a high level of visual polish, that can
>> be built for multiple OS's and platforms, and that plays nicel
Am 2007-11-19 um 22:23 schrieb Scott Frankel:
> Would Idle be a good choice for IDE if I were to use wx? I've seen
> Python plugins for XCode. Would that support debugging?
Please look for the several IDE threads in the ML's archive.
Short answer: IDLE is dead, and XCode is uncomfortable for P
> Ultimately, I'm looking for a windowing toolkit that uses native
> widgets, one that can provide a high level of visual polish, that can
> be built for multiple OS's and platforms, and that plays nicely with
> Python.
Another possibility is to use Java Swing, via JCC, Andi Vajda's system
for pro
>> What is the most popular python distribution for OS X ?
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
Scott Frankel wrote:
> Would Idle be a good choice for IDE if I were to use wx?
Just be clear - the choice of IDE should be completely independent of
choice of GUI toolkit.
You can use Eclipse+PyDev just fine with wx, for instance (ad fine as
you can use Eclipse+PyDev for anything, anyway)
A r
Michele Hjorleifsson wrote:
>>> What is the most popular python distribution for OS X ?
I don't know about most popular but the best supported on this list is
the "Universal Framework Build" of 2.5 -- from either:
http://www.python.org/download/
or
http://pythonmac.org/packages/py25-fat/inde
Hi folks,
I went looking for a Universal Binary of MySQL-python (aka MySQLdb)
now that I moved over to 2.5. Saw that there wasn't on undefined, so
attempted to build myself. I get some rather weird stuff, that when
googled only produces one slightly relevant result at http://
tinyurl.com/2a
I'm pretty sure I didn't patch anything. I think what I had to do was
take a PPC MySQL library and an x86 MySQL library and use lipo to
splice them together, but other than that it compiled fine I believe.
We haven't had a reason to use MySQL with Python for a few years now,
so I'm not going to tr
I'll take a new look at wxPython and Editra. I'll also check out
SPE. Time to adopt a more robust debugging scheme than tossing print
statements through Emacs ...
Thanks all!
Scott
On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Scott Frankel wrote:
>> Would Idle be a good ch
On 19-Nov-07, at 7:21 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I didn't patch anything. I think what I had to do was
> take a PPC MySQL library and an x86 MySQL library and use lipo to
> splice them together, but other than that it compiled fine I believe.
>
> We haven't had a reason to use MySQ
19 matches
Mail list logo
