On 20 dec 2007, at 12:35, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> That's easily fixable. I'm thinking about reviving Jack's MacPython
> addons idea: a small .mpkg that will install IDLE.app, a 64-bit
> command-line interpreter and some small fixes (such as the distutiles
> one). That should make Leopard's bu
On Dec 21, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Jack Jansen wrote:
> I think this would be a very good idea, even if only from a
> "political" point of view.
> Even though I've been an open source developer since long before the
> word existed I find that I'm getting sick and tired of the reinvent-
> the-world atti
On Friday, December 21, 2007, at 09:48AM, "Jack Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>On 20 dec 2007, at 12:35, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>>
>> That's easily fixable. I'm thinking about reviving Jack's MacPython
>> addons idea: a small .mpkg that will install IDLE.app, a 64-bit
>> command-line in
Hi all,
Just ran into the following problem when trying to install appscript
0.18.0 into Leopard's default Python installation via easy_install
(setuptools 0.6c3):
has$ /usr/bin/easy_install appscript
Searching for appscript
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/appscript/
Reading http://apps
I've been thinking a bit more about being forced to upgrade package X
when I'm not interested, and I realised that the times it really
bothers me are even one more step removed: if I was interested in
package X and the website/whatever told me "don't use the current
version of X, use the ne
