Hi Matt, From the description this looks like a bug in pythonnet. Can you tell which version of pythonnet are you using? Regards,Victor From: [email protected]: Friday, August 13, 2021 8:59 PMTo: [email protected]: [Python.NET] "TypeError: No method matches given arguments" Error - p
Exactly the same issue is reported here: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/issues/1680 Have you seen it? From: Felix BourbonnaisSent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:53 PMTo: [email protected]: [Python.NET] Stricter types in 3.0 Hello, as was discussed in the bi-weekly meeting, the new
Please, use myPyByteArray.GetBuffer() and the PyBuffer.Read method to copy from a NumPy array. I created a feature request to make the default conversion mechanism take advantage of PyBuffer some time in the future. Regards,Victor From: Jordan GUILLOTSent: Monday, June 27, 2022 8:19 AMTo: pythonnet
Hi Mark, You are facing https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/issues/514 At this moment the easiest way to do it is to add a method to ServiceInformation to add an item to SerivceHosts collection. E.g. public void AddServiceHost(string serviceHost) => this.ServiceHosts.Add(serviceHost); then call
AnyCPU assemblies can use x86 and x64 assemblies, as long as they run with corresponding architecture (check Prefer 32-bit setting if you are experiencing issue with x64 assembly). You need a pythonnet dll matching your Python architecture. Regards,Victor From: Govil NagSent: Wednesday, March 4, 2
en Sie, ob die Aufrufkonvention und die Parameter der PInvoke-Signatur mit der nicht verwalteten Zielsignatur übereinstimmen." On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:02 PM Victor “LOST” Milovanov <[email protected]> wrote:AnyCPU assemblies can use x86 and x64 assemblies, as long as they run with corresp
n pythonnet repo. On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:20 PM Victor “LOST” Milovanov <[email protected]> wrote:This sounds like a bug. Can you provide· full stack trace· full OS name and version· Python version and architecture· Python.NET version· the source of Python.NET (e.g. NuGet or pip package
Attendees: Victor, Amos, Mohamed AgendaReview action items from last meeting:Victor will create codecs repo on githubAmos to create issue or PR to make implicit operator for reference types to convert reference to IntPtrAmos will create wiki page to explain soft shutdownBenedikt will look into crea
Hi Mohamed, Have you tried this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51198353/unmanagedexports-error-rgiesecke-dllexport-msbuild-dllexportappdomainisolatedta It seems like the tool depends on .NET 3.5, and that is the issue you are seeing. Regards,Victor From: Mohamed KoubaaSent: Monday, March 9, 2
Attendees: Victor, Benedikt, Amos, Mohamed, Mark AgendaReview action items from last meeting[x] Viktor to create issue to track removing old solutions[ ] Continue PyHandle/References discussion on GitHub[ ] Amos will create a test for WrapperStorer demonstrating it[x] Amos please review PR #1094[ ]
Attendees: Victor, Benedikt, Amos AgendaReview action items from last meeting[x] Review/progress Codec PR on main branch[x] review/progress Codec PR in Codecs[x] Tests are failing in Codecs[x] Mohamed will join modernisation effort[x] Benedikt will publish PRs for modernisation[+-] Need to determin
Attendees: Victor, Benedikt, Amos AgendaReview action items from last meeting[x] Review/progress Codec PR on main branch[x] review/progress Codec PR in Codecs[x] Tests are failing in Codecs[x] Mohamed will join modernisation effort[x] Benedikt will publish PRs for modernisation[+-] Need to determin
Attendees: Felix, Mohamed, Victor, Amos AgendaReview action items from last meeting:Benedikt to confirm WITH_DEBUG builds need to be updated for 3.9 (low priority) and will create issue to document for laterVictor will check out PyType_FromSpec branch on the issue with Python types deriving from Sy
Attendees: Victor, Amos, Benoit, MarkV, Mohamed, Felix AgendaReview Action ItemsAmos: Set test (in TestFinalizer) to ignore. Create a ticketPush the updated soft-reload branch (today!)Then Victor or Benedikt can merge the Amos branch. Do not squashVictor: take a look at Mohamed’s PR issue with Exce
The original bug report described a similar problem, except the behavior without defaulting to stricter interface types is very unintuitive. Imagine you have a well documented library, that exposes property Prop of type IInterface. When specific class implements some Method in IInterface explicitl
Hi Manu, Please, take a look at https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/issues/857 Benedikt is currently working on it. I’ll send you his email separately. Regards,Victor From: Emmanuel RutovicSent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 6:01 PMTo: A list for users and developers of Python.NETSubject: [Python.
Can you try this from C# interactive (or plain C#)? #r "C:\Test_MW\Tools\GuiTest\ExamRecordHelper.dll"using ExamRecordHelper; var record = new ExamRecordLoader("C:\\Test_MW\\Tools\\ExamRecords\\Resp4DCT"); Without having ExamRecordHelper.dll, it is hard to guess otherwise, but I agree with Manu, th
y. This could be a global flag on the runtime and/or an attribute on a class/interface to decide on a granular level whether the specific class/interface will use interface method binding or instance method binding. Thoughts? Thanks!MohamedFrom: Victor “LOST” Milovanov Sent: Monday, November 2,
isn't option 4 what we had prior to #1240?) Thanks,MohamedFrom: Victor “LOST” Milovanov Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 12:56 PMTo: A list for users and developers of Python.NET Subject: [Python.NET] Re: Wrap in interface (#1240) [External Sender]A dump of thoughts on the matter: IronPyth
19 matches
Mail list logo
