[Pywikipedia-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T286369: reflinks.py skips some identical references for unknown reason

gerritbot added a comment. Change 703859 **merged** by jenkins-bot: [pywikibot/core@master] [bugfix] Don't ignore identical references with newline in ref content https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/703859 TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T286369 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Pywikipedia-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T286369: reflinks.py skips some identical references for unknown reason

gerritbot added a comment. Change 703859 had a related patch set uploaded (by Xqt; author: Xqt): [pywikibot/core@master] [bugfix] Don't ignore identical references with newline in ref content https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/703859 TASK DETAIL

[Pywikipedia-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T286369: reflinks.py skips some identical references for unknown reason

Xqt added a comment. In T286369#7202436 , @Rubin16 wrote: > I agree, dotall isn't good, because now bot fixes cases when we have two different references with the same name. But are references actually different in the article I

[Pywikipedia-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T286369: reflinks.py skips some identical references for unknown reason

Rubin16 added a comment. I agree, dotall isn't good, because now bot fixes cases when we have two different references with the same name. But are references actually different in the article I provided? For me it seems equal TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T286369 EMAIL