Hi,
This project has done a big change in its infrastructure and it's normal
to hit sharp corners at the beginning. Looking at how the transition has
gone for the rest of MediaWiki / Wikimedia projects you can be quite
confident that the change is worth.
The type of discussions you are havin
On 6 October 2013 20:22, Strainu wrote:
> Gerrit has a bad reputation, and seemingly well deserved. Just
> yesterday, Andrew Klapper was asking in a bug a submitted if the
> pywikibot would not prefer getting patches in gerrit directly and I
> was like "oh God, plese don't let that happen" :)
>
On 1 October 2013 20:34, Jan DudÃk wrote:
> now there was critical bug with interwiki.py, which happened about 15th
> september. In these days was old sourceforge tracker moved to bugzilla, so
> report was lost somewhere. After ten days I reported this bug again[1].
> Three days later there was p
On 6 October 2013 10:52, Dr. Trigon wrote:
> As we have introduced version numbers into the code with [1] and [2],
> namely '1.0b1' and '2.0b1' I want to mention that we should agree on a
> version numbering philosophy. I assume the 'b1' stands for 'beta
> relase 1' is that correct? Why beta?
>
B
