Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs

2012-12-27 Thread Bináris
2012/12/27 > I found these edits depends on sighted versions. Any (bot) edit on > unsighted versions keeps unsighted until it is explicit marked as sighted. > > Yes, and this is the problem, because the patrollers complain on being the sighting more complicated because of cosmetic changes (see th

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs

2012-12-27 Thread info
] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs > Hi folks around the world, > > there was a debate in Huwiki about cosmetic changes which have a very > limited popularity. One of the problems is that we have Flagged Revs, and > when a bot edits an unpatrolled page, it will be hard to overvie

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs

2012-12-25 Thread Bináris
You can't mark a change without marking the preceding changes. You may mark versions, not changes. 2012/12/26 Strainu > Hi, > > I don't know much about the extension, but AFAIK, Flagged Revs works > on diffs. Wouldn't it be enough if you marked the particular change > you make as patrolled? The

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs

2012-12-25 Thread Strainu
Hi, I don't know much about the extension, but AFAIK, Flagged Revs works on diffs. Wouldn't it be enough if you marked the particular change you make as patrolled? The Site class has a function patrol which receives a revision ID as parameter. Obviously, the downside is you have to have patrol rig

[Pywikipedia-l] Cosmetic changes and flagged revs

2012-12-25 Thread Bináris
Hi folks around the world, there was a debate in Huwiki about cosmetic changes which have a very limited popularity. One of the problems is that we have Flagged Revs, and when a bot edits an unpatrolled page, it will be hard to overview changes and difficult to patrol it after cosmetic changes. Pa