Hi,
This project has done a big change in its infrastructure and it's normal
to hit sharp corners at the beginning. Looking at how the transition has
gone for the rest of MediaWiki / Wikimedia projects you can be quite
confident that the change is worth.
The type of discussions you are havin
On 6 October 2013 20:22, Strainu wrote:
> Gerrit has a bad reputation, and seemingly well deserved. Just
> yesterday, Andrew Klapper was asking in a bug a submitted if the
> pywikibot would not prefer getting patches in gerrit directly and I
> was like "oh God, plese don't let that happen" :)
>
On 1 October 2013 20:34, Jan Dudík wrote:
> now there was critical bug with interwiki.py, which happened about 15th
> september. In these days was old sourceforge tracker moved to bugzilla, so
> report was lost somewhere. After ten days I reported this bug again[1].
> Three days later there was p
No kind of technical gugugaga is worth to lose xqt. He is more important in
this project by far than any infrastructure.
2013/10/7 Amir Ladsgroup
> I need to say something important, fortunately we didn't loose xqt, he (or
> she) was on vacation for one week. xqt said if the problem of git won'
I need to say something important, fortunately we didn't loose xqt, he (or
she) was on vacation for one week. xqt said if the problem of git won't be
solved, he (or she) will abandon participating in pywikibot, but main
problem got solved and we are happy to have him :)
about the migration: it's a
You also have the option of not using git-review. I don't.
-Chad
On Oct 6, 2013 11:23 AM, "Strainu" wrote:
> 2013/10/6 Dr. Trigon :
> >
> > I was not there - but you should not simply neglect that there are
> > serious issues with git under win. Please ask e.g. Xqt - as far as I
> > know he was
2013/10/6 Dr. Trigon :
>
> I was not there - but you should not simply neglect that there are
> serious issues with git under win. Please ask e.g. Xqt - as far as I
> know he was not able to set-up a properly working system for git
> review under win until today... which means we have lost one of o
Dr. Trigon, thanks for the resume. I think I will follow this idea and do
checkouts with SVN via github, and try to return to develeoper community at
a later stage.
However, tha lack of me as a developer is quite unimportant compared to the
lack of xqt which is a basic problem for our community. Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> NO! people hadn't issue with git (because we provided files in
> flash drives), main problem was BS. IMHO people should run bots in
> WMF Labs, not their home PC, and high proportion of bot operators
> are doing what is correct in my opinion. NO! the
I use compat on labs, my local computer for development, and an old box
that I use as a webserver. Two of those three all run windows, I actually
use a process that migrates from git to svn for all code thats being used.
I have found both the stuff that has been recently added to compat and git
to
2013/10/2 Amir Ladsgroup
>
> because high proportion of them are running (or should be running) in
> Labs. I'm not saying we need to abandon supporting windows.
>
This concerns only automated bots. Many of us use Pywikibot interactively.
___
Pywikipedi
@John: please don't do that, poor kittens. Indeed pywikibot supports,
I did so many things to keep comparability of other projects. What i
meant is "80% of pywikibot users are using windows" is not True
because high proportion of them are running (or should be running) in
Labs. I'm not saying we ne
2013/10/1 Jan Dudík
> I still don't understand, why was abandoned SVN and is there some git
> instead.
>
It is as simple as follows:
- SVN was perfect for Pywikibot community, but not for Mediawiki
developers. They have much more complex processes that are not served well
enough by SVN
The comment about WMF labs makes me want to kill kittens. Pywikipedia
supports a lot of other projects besides the WMF. Your POV lacks
perspective.
On Tuesday, October 1, 2013, Tom wrote:
> For what it's worth. I was ready to give up on Git with php dev until I
> started using the IDE, Eclipse, a
For what it's worth. I was ready to give up on Git with php dev until I started
using the IDE, Eclipse, as my "local" version control of my repo with the Git
plugin. IMO, the interface of Git for windows is garbage and the syntax isn't
as user friendly or intuitive as it could be. I uninstalled
On 10/1/13, Jan Dudík wrote:
> I still don't understand, why was abandoned SVN and is there some git
> instead.
>
Git despite being pain in the ass sometimes because of complexity is a
pretty damn good version control system
> In svn times when there was some critical problem, usually was patch a
2013/10/1 Adrián Chaves Fernández
> O Martes, 1 de Outubro de 2013 20:34:49 Jan Dudík escribiu:
>
> Nothing to do with Git, then :)
everything to do with no-more-svn. You can name it git, gerrit, giggle,
genital or other g...
> > The second problem is git: some people on IRC said, that there w
O Martes, 1 de Outubro de 2013 20:34:49 Jan Dudík escribiu:
> I still don't understand, why was abandoned SVN and is there some git
> instead.
>
> In svn times when there was some critical problem, usually was patch after
> some hours. One person wrote it, submited it and other users can download
I still don't understand, why was abandoned SVN and is there some git
instead.
In svn times when there was some critical problem, usually was patch after
some hours. One person wrote it, submited it and other users can download
and use.
now there was critical bug with interwiki.py, which happened
19 matches
Mail list logo
