Recently we had a few cases of code that didnt compile getting merged
(I have +2 some of them.. :/), so I have fast tracked the addition of
a set of tests which run every script with -help , and with -simulate.
These new tests add about 3 minutes to the test suite execution, and
add basic
@Amir
If a section is unsigned and there is no timestamp, how can you find
sections via their revision timestamp? And expect that the timestamp is a
datetime object?
Mpaa
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:57 AM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Recently we had a few cases of code that
Mpaa: I meant getting section date by getting history and analyzing
revisions instead of checking signature on them.
Best
On 8/2/14, Mpaa mpaa.w...@gmail.com wrote:
@Amir
If a section is unsigned and there is no timestamp, how can you find
sections via their revision timestamp? And expect
Analyzing history instead of parsing timestamps from wikitext won't work
because it will catch things like {{resolved}} tags that shouldn't delay
archiving. It also will keep the common hack of adding a timestamp far in
the future to prevent premature archiving from working.
On Aug 2, 2014 10:26
: 26.07.2014 23:22
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about.
On 7/27/14, i...@gno.de i...@gno.de wrote:
This is not a bug in testing. The test detects a bug for archivebot.py
which
fails
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 23:22
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about.
On 7/27/14, i...@gno.de i...@gno.de wrote:
This is not a bug in testing. The test detects a bug for archivebot.py
This is not a bug in testing. The test detects a bug for archivebot.py which
fails for unsigned threads.
xqt
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: John Mark Vandenberg
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 18:21
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
On Sat, Jul 26
: 26.07.2014 18:21
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Ricordisamoa
ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
The build is still broken, but because of this edit, that breaks the
timestamp detection of the ArchiveBot
Ah, maybe. I just saw your fixes at my Talk page(s).
xqt
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Amir Ladsgroup
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 23:22
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about.
On 7/27/14
, maybe. I just saw your fixes at my Talk page(s).
xqt
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Amir Ladsgroup
Gesendet: 26.07.2014 23:22
An: Pywikibot discussion list
Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken
it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about.
On 7/27/14
The build was repeatedly broken over the last week.
Two of the build breakages have been fixed.
I think one was caused by changes to WMF site configuration.
https://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/pywikibot-core/builds/30824554
And the other caused by merging a fix without checking the tests
worked
11 matches
Mail list logo