Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

cc'ing shizhao. On Aug 1, 2014 8:58 AM, "John Mark Vandenberg" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Ricordisamoa > wrote: > > Please sign off a Code-Review+1 for > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/139294/. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Il 09/06/2014 10:02, Nicolas Dumazet ha scritto: >

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > Please sign off a Code-Review+1 for > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/139294/. > Thanks in advance. > > Il 09/06/2014 10:02, Nicolas Dumazet ha scritto: > > Hey folks, > > Sorry about that. I'd happily relicense the original code under wh

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

Please sign off a Code-Review+1 for gerrit:139294 . Thanks in advance. Il 09/06/2014 10:02, Nicolas Dumazet ha scritto: Hey folks, Sorry about that. I'd happily relicense the original code under whatever is convenient for you. If anyone contributed t

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

That is exactly what I was going to do ;-) Il 12/06/2014 21:08, Antoine Musso ha scritto: Le 12/06/2014 01:48, Ricordisamoa a écrit : I love the GPL /per se/, but I hate license conflicts. IMHO we should send an email to each author. The way I have seen it done in the past is to propose a pat

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

Le 12/06/2014 01:48, Ricordisamoa a écrit : > I love the GPL /per se/, but I hate license conflicts. IMHO we should > send an email to each author. The way I have seen it done in the past is to propose a patch, have all past authors added as a reviewers and mass mail them until they each vote +1.

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > I love the GPL *per se*, but I hate license conflicts. IMHO we should > send an email to each author. > > Il 09/06/2014 11:28, xqt ha scritto: > > We had 18 authors contributing to this code. Either we keep it as it is or we > could double

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

I love the GPL /per se/, but I hate license conflicts. IMHO we should send an email to each author. Il 09/06/2014 11:28, xqt ha scritto: Hey folks, Sorry about that. I'd happily relicense the original code under whatever is convenient for you. If anyone contributed to the file in the meantime

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

- Original Nachricht Von: Nicolas Dumazet An: pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Datum: 09.06.2014 10:02 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL? > Hey folks, > > Sorry about that. I'd happily relicense the original code under whatever is > c

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

Hey folks, Sorry about that. I'd happily relicense the original code under whatever is convenient for you. If anyone contributed to the file in the meantime, I'm afraid you'd have to ask those guys for permission, too :( ___ Pywikipedia-l mailing list P

Re: [Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

IIRC NicDumZ was the original writer of the code, I send them an e-mail about this Best On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote: > I found this in the source code of scripts/reflinks.py: > Distributed under the terms of the GPL > > This

[Pywikipedia-l] reflinks.py under GPL?

I found this in the source code of scripts/reflinks.py: Distributed under the terms of the GPL This seems to be the single case in the whole repository. Is it compatible with our license conventions? It even doesn't have a full GNU-style license header.