On 30 December 2012 22:34, Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/30 Dr. Trigon dr.tri...@surfeu.ch
to git. For me the most important thing would be that finally somebody
is able to build a VCS that is not that bad that everybody has to
replace it after 5 years again...(CVS, SVN, git,
In the past couple of days I was reworking my mediawiki dev setup, and I
think it might be useful to the script runners/writers as well - an
auto-configured (vagrant) linux virtualbox without gui and with all dev
files residing on the host.
All dev files reside on the host and are simply mapped
2012/12/30 Dr. Trigon dr.tri...@surfeu.ch
to git. For me the most important thing would be that finally somebody
is able to build a VCS that is not that bad that everybody has to
replace it after 5 years again...(CVS, SVN, git, next candidate?)
(how should it explain this to my children...?!
Responding to both Maarten and Yuri because of a large overlap in
their opinions ;-)
On 26 December 2012 16:45, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote:
As a consequence, the WMF also wants to stop running their svn
server - which is the server we are using.
No planned date yet so we don't
So - yes, there are certainly advantages in moving to gerrit. But,
compared to github, the documentation is much less clear. However,
maybe the right response is 'fix the docs' instead of using github :-)
Agree - lets fix gerrit docs and benefit the entire MW infrastructure. And
I think it is
Some remarks from me. Sorry I am not quite familar with git/gerrit vcs as well
as svn. I just use these things as long they work for me. I use tortoiseSVN
for the svn repository and I played a bit with tortoiseGit and mw repository
samples. I guess the only thing I need for git repository is
Hello all,
As you might know, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has moved most
Mediawiki (MW)-related repositories from svn version control to git +
gerrit. As a consequence, the WMF also wants to stop running their svn
server - which is the server we are using.
Now the question is: where do we
2012/12/26 Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl:
Hello all,
As you might know, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has moved most
Mediawiki (MW)-related repositories from svn version control to git +
gerrit. As a consequence, the WMF also wants to stop running their svn
server - which is the
Hoi Merlijn,
Op 26-12-2012 13:28, Merlijn van Deen schreef:
Hello all,
As you might know, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has moved most
Mediawiki (MW)-related repositories from svn version control to git +
gerrit. As a consequence, the WMF also wants to stop running their svn
server - which is
SVN - I think we should be moving away from it. If we switch to a host that
has specialized GIT+SVN support, it will be hard to move away to another
provider that doesn't have elaborate SVN features.
Agree with Martin re moving closer to API MW in general. Hosting on MW
gives us a very different
I don't know git and gerrit and can't compare the possibilities.
All I would like that if we have to move someone write a step-by-step
manual for newbies.
--
Bináris
___
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
Pywikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
