Re: [QA AUTOMATION] Standalone Tests now available in standalone-test branch

2021-09-30 Thread Marcus
your work. That this test suite is now more modern but first of all usable with a fresh build AOO is a really great improvement. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: Start working on AOO 4.1.11?

2021-05-15 Thread Marcus
without the big warning from Windows. Looks promising for future builds. And still with the warning message for bad hyperlinks. ;-) Marcus Am 14.05.21 um 07:14 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.21 um 07:50 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: can

Re: Start working on AOO 4.1.11?

2021-05-13 Thread Marcus
Am 13.05.21 um 07:50 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: can someone please allow setting '4.1.11' as 'Target Milestone' on BugZilla? I would like to set it on https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128453 done marcus

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Merge PR-125 into 4.1.X branch

2021-04-12 Thread Marcus
plan to pull these in to the 4.1.X branch after 72 hours. [1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/125 please wait until the new release is done. We shouldn't do too many things at the same time on the same loction. Thanks M

Re: Duplicate bugs: resolved vs closed

2021-02-15 Thread Marcus
heir end status which is always "Closed". So, I've just closed them. :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Duplicate bugs: shall we follow strict chronological order?

2021-02-11 Thread Marcus
in advance for your guidance, I hope this is helpful for you. That's the way I'm doing it. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Please add me to the "qa-team"

2018-10-21 Thread Marcus
technical point of view) with this mailing list. Hugo: nothing else to do besides the request you have already sent; Marcus or one of the Bugzilla administrators will add the requested role to your Bugzilla account. I've added the "qa-team", "canconfirm" and "e

Re: Requesting to be added to bugzilla list "qa-team"

2017-12-27 Thread Marcus
- Documentation, QA thanks for the data. I've added you to the webpage. For an CWiki account please have a look here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home Marcus On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 27.12.2017 um 11:30 schrieb DurgaPrasad Potnuru:

Re: Requesting to be added to bugzilla list "qa-team"

2017-12-27 Thread Marcus
possible for you to check that .. sure, do you have link to the list? Thanks Marcus On Dec 27, 2017 15:41, "Marcus" wrote: Thanks for your offer to help. I've added your user to the "qa-team" in Bugzilla. PS: Please note that many of us volunteers are in the year end

Re: Requesting to be added to bugzilla list "qa-team"

2017-12-27 Thread Marcus
Thanks for your offer to help. I've added your user to the "qa-team" in Bugzilla. PS: Please note that many of us volunteers are in the year end holidays. So, things are going more slowly than on other days. Marcus Am 26.12.2017 um 18:31 schrieb DurgaPrasad Potnuru: Any on

Re: Access denied on Dictionaries page

2017-10-26 Thread Marcus
Am 26.10.2017 um 23:24 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Am 26.10.2017 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: If we see users confused by the "double update" process we will have to add an item to the Release Notes. I don't understand what you want to write to the release note

Re: Access denied on Dictionaries page

2017-10-26 Thread Marcus
Am 26.10.2017 um 22:23 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 26/10/2017 Marcus wrote: Am 26.10.2017 um 12:09 schrieb Marco A.G.Pinto: Now I get an access error in the official page: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice maybe a temporary outage in the

Re: Access denied on Dictionaries page

2017-10-26 Thread Marcus
27;ve test now and it's working. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Request to be added to Bugzilla

2016-12-18 Thread Marcus
k now on the issues in Bugzilla. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Volunteer

2016-12-18 Thread Marcus
the project. The QA area is not the best documented one. So, for questions please ask here. Have fun. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h

Re: Volunteer

2016-12-16 Thread Marcus
unsubscribe please see the text at the end of this mail. Marcus -- From: "Anuradha Patil" Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:44 PM To: Subject: Volunteer Hi, I am unable to add myself to the volunteer list. Please help me do so.

Re: Adding into Bugzilla list

2016-11-12 Thread Marcus
user account to the groups "qa-team" and "canconfirm", so that you should be able to work on the issues. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

2016-11-06 Thread Marcus
updates. With the button [Comment] you can go on commenting. Have fun Marcus Am 11/05/2016 10:30 PM, schrieb Mark Thomas: As you've probably noticed, your Bugzilla instance was upgraded a few minutes ago to 5.0.3. I've run some basic tests and all looks OK but, as alwa

Re: [QA] - Add to the "qa-team" group in Bugzilla

2016-10-29 Thread Marcus
rst to the qa-team group in Bugzilla. we have still both user accounts in BZ. For your @gmail.com account I've added the "qa-team" group. HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.or

Re: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

2016-08-23 Thread Marcus
adding the German set later. German won't be ready in the next hours but hopefuĺly within this week. So, we should go online with the stuff we have. Marcus -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 15:02 To: d...@openo

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-19 Thread Marcus
s point. I am going to 1.0.0 now, essentially with the 0.2.0 except for the change of version number and removal of the limitation to testing use. I did the other repair you suggested. I think Marcus is ready on the other binaries, so something will happen tomorrow (Friday). I'm not

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-18 Thread Marcus
.bat files differ from the past ones. I've not run the new ones again but looked closely to the diff output. There are no functional changes but only for file name and version. If I should run them again, just tell me. Otherwise I think also this ZIP is ready to do its work. Marcus ---

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Am 08/14/2016 07:10 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Am 08/14/2016 10:17 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 08/14/2016 01:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Thanks for the checking, Marcus. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-14 Thread Marcus
Am 08/14/2016 01:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Thanks for the checking, Marcus. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-13 Thread Marcus
ing the script files. This will be a great help for the normal users. If you need more details or tests just tell me. Marcus -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: qa@openo

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Marcus
Am 08/07/2016 07:30 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Feedback

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-07 Thread Marcus
for the ASC file. Line 183 and 186: Both parts can be described together to save 1 step. Line 208: This step should be avoided (see at the top of this mail). Line 222-231: As stated previously (line 86-89). Line 240: To give (again) the hint that OpenOffice should be closed before renaming the f

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

2016-08-04 Thread Marcus
istrator, a normal user cannot modify anything in the OpenOffice directory) and exchanged the DLL. * [IMPORTANT] Identify any missing, incomplete or confusing information in the README. Describe what you see as important improvements before making general

Re: [QA] Request for Bugzilla "qa-team" group

2016-04-15 Thread Marcus
ct reports. Thank you. I've added you to the groups "qa-team" and "canconfirm". Welcome to the team. Have fun. :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org Fo

Re: [DISCUSS] Cleanup needed for RESOLVED-FIXED issues

2016-04-09 Thread Marcus
committed into Trunk before the project and software was transferred to Apache. So, do we have a list of outstanding CWS from 2011 that were not transferred to Apache? Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: q

Re: [DISCUSS] Cleanup needed for RESOLVED-FIXED issues

2016-04-08 Thread Marcus
Am 04/08/2016 07:04 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/07/2016 06:35 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: My only concern is that this is a giant CTR and pretty much assures that the "R" will

Re: [DISCUSS] Cleanup needed for RESOLVED-FIXED issues

2016-04-07 Thread Marcus
ime. ;-( For the time being we have only the way do disable completely sending mails when we work on the issue. But this means that *absolutely no mails will be sent* regardless what was done (new issue, change, comments, closing, etc.). [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla

Re: Issues need 4.2.0 as Target Milestone

2016-03-31 Thread Marcus
Am 03/31/2016 08:26 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 03/31/2016 07:19 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Target milestones depend on the product in BZ. There is no 4.2.0 target right now (except for "gsl"). I marked (in the past) several issues as target 4.2.0, not only in gsl. Now

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-31 Thread Marcus
Am 03/31/2016 07:40 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set when an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user requests or h

Re: Issues need 4.2.0 as Target Milestone

2016-03-31 Thread Marcus
Am 03/31/2016 07:19 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Target milestones depend on the product in BZ. There is no 4.2.0 target right now (except for "gsl"). I marked (in the past) several issues as target 4.2.0, not only in gsl. Now I see that in https://bz.apache.org/ooo

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-31 Thread Marcus
s the source code please use as always the RESOLVED - FIXED resolution status. Marcus Am 03/26/2016 10:58 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 03/26/2016 10:50 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Am 03/26/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: If the aim is to create less confusion, all proposals

Re: Issues need 4.2.0 as Target Milestone

2016-03-31 Thread Marcus
say the least. the targets were a bit messed up. I've cleaned them up and added to all enabled products a "4.2.0" target. If something is missing just give me a hint. Thanks Marcus On 03/30/2016 04:04 PM, Marcus wrote: Target milestones depend on the product in BZ. There i

Re: Issues need 4.2.0 as Target Milestone

2016-03-30 Thread Marcus
; which can maybe help in the meantime. BTW: You were just a few seconds faster with your mail than me. ;-) Marcus Am 03/31/2016 12:59 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: I'm not sure how this happened but it seems not all issues can access 4.2.0 as Target Milestone. I would think all issues could access

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-22 Thread Marcus
field On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus: [ ,,, ] [ ... ] what about RESOLVED - MANAGED? This word is maybe better known in the world. This term shows that the issue has some work in it and was tackled. With a closing comment you can see where and

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-22 Thread Marcus
of this whole discussion. OK, it seems you also like the idea to have another resolution status - it just depends on what the name is, right? ;-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-22 Thread Marcus
Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53 To: qa@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-22 Thread Marcus
ed). I believe Apache QA needs a flowchart such as https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/c/c4/Unconfirmed_Bugs_Status_ Flowchart_Version_0.1.pdf https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/c/cb/Unconfirmed_Bugs_Status_Flowchart.odg [orcmid] Marcus ---

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-22 Thread Marcus
/wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/c/cb/Unconfirmed_Bugs_Status_Flowchart.odg I'm pretty sure we have a similar flow chart somewhere in the depths of our Wiki. But yes, in general this would help to understand how the issue statuses are working together. Marcus ---

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-21 Thread Marcus
Am 03/22/2016 12:30 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 03/21/2016 10:36 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [top posting] Thanks for all the help with this and for the new NONE for target release. Hopefully, it will be used sparingly assuming we us e RESOLVED

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-21 Thread Marcus
s that actually show this. Marcus And, dang, one my examples was NOT a correct illustration of the problem. Too many BZ windows open yesterday I guess. Ok, back to my investigations. On 03/21/2016 12:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan [mail

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

2016-03-20 Thread Marcus
e application modules and related things). Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Should i change the status of a bug if i really think it is a bug

2015-11-20 Thread Marcus
ou to that and then you can revert your action - or write another comment with correcting your last comment. > If it is so, please tell me, so i could review and change all the things that i have done so far. :-) That's OK. In general, look and test carefully and act as best as you

Re: Join Bugzilla qa-team

2015-11-11 Thread Marcus
quot;qa-team" permission. This enables you to confirm issues and to set the right status. Have fun. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [BUGZILLA] The OS field is not sorted and could be therefore improved

2015-11-10 Thread Marcus
As there was no objection or different opinions the changes were made and are now online. Marcus Am 11/07/2015 08:40 PM, schrieb Marcus: When creating a new issue (or for an existing one, if you want to choose a better one), then IMHO the users expect a different sorting. Therefore I want

Re: [QA]

2015-11-10 Thread Marcus
elling you have used to create the account? Thanks Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [QA]

2015-11-10 Thread Marcus
quot;canconfirm" and "qa-team" permission. This enables you to confirm issues and to set the right status. Have fun. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org Fo

Re: [QA]

2015-11-09 Thread Marcus
quot;qa-team" permission. This enables you to confirm issues and to set the right status. Have fun. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Introduction for subscription

2015-11-08 Thread Marcus
s for your Bugzilla account. You got the "canconfirm" and "qa-team" permission. This enables you to confirm issues and to set the right status. Have fun. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@

Re: [BUGZILLA] The OS field is not sorted and could be therefore improved

2015-11-07 Thread Marcus
Am 11/07/2015 08:48 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: +1 I suggest that a lazy consensus be started on dev@ and, absent any objection, go ahead. done, you were a bit fast with your mail. ;-) Marcus (You could probably just do it. An account on dev@ is appropriate though.) -Original

[BUGZILLA] The OS field is not sorted and could be therefore improved

2015-11-07 Thread Marcus
When creating a new issue (or for an existing one, if you want to choose a better one), then IMHO the users expect a different sorting. Therefore I want to improve the list to get the most used systems at top like the following: All Windows, all Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7 Windows Serv

Re: QA bug reports

2015-11-07 Thread Marcus
Am 11/06/2015 11:07 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 06/11/2015 David Haigh wrote: Do you have a small batch of reports to be assigned to me? Welcome to the QA list! Someone, probably Marcus, will soon give the right privileges to you and the other volunteers who joined today. I've ch

Re: We need 4.1.2 added to the version menu...

2015-10-29 Thread Marcus
Am 10/29/2015 10:27 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 10/29/2015 10:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Hello,BZ admins. It's time to add 4.1.2 to the Version menu list. I thought about this already today. Thanks for your hint. I'll start this now. Unfortunately, this has to be done product by product

Re: We need 4.1.2 added to the version menu...

2015-10-29 Thread Marcus
the "Last Confirmation" field has already a 4.1.2 value. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: karma needed on a query

2015-10-16 Thread Marcus
Am 10/16/2015 12:51 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 10/15/2015 02:37 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/15/2015 09:20 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: The following query is being referenced in the release notes for 4.1.2 for "fixed issues"-- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&

Re: karma needed on a query

2015-10-15 Thread Marcus
y to the footer of every BZ webpage. When you go into your BZ preferences and then into your saved searches, maybe you can see a special option for oyur own queries. HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@ope

Re: Release status - Please test OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC2

2015-10-15 Thread Marcus
should be able to change the issue status now. If not, just tell me. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: propose RC4 on revision 1587478

2014-04-17 Thread Marcus (OOo)
looks like an simple and acceptable workaround for the Mac/Linux users. When I understand Herbert's last comment [1] correctly, then it sounds for me as a fix for the next release (4.1.1 or 4.2.0). [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124701#c9 M

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

2014-04-02 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... What a mere chance. :-) Marcus On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi

Re: [RELEASE]: refined AOO 4.1 beta schedule

2014-02-27 Thread Marcus (OOo)
l try to make one day off to be available on March 10th the whole day, so we can be flexible with announcements and publications. Marcus [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes ---

Re: Wikis down

2014-02-17 Thread Marcus (OOo)
. Thanks a lot for your effort. I've removed the webpage hint. Marcus On 17 February 2014 20:42, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 02/17/2014 07:34 PM, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: Hi all, Wikis have been down for 2 days or so, <http://monitoring.apache.org/status/> shows critical f

Re: Wikis down

2014-02-17 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Wiki is down and we are working on it. This should avoid user complains about non-working Wiki. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Someone forgot to change the tip "openoffice.org" to "openoffice"

2014-01-18 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Fixed, thanks for the hint. Marcus Am 01/18/2014 09:06 PM, schrieb Marco A.G.Pinto: Hello! In the main site, when one hovers with the mouse over the "download" link at the top, it says "download openoffice.org" when the ".org" should be removed. Here is a

Re: Some thoughts on quality

2013-08-14 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/14/2013 09:58 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/14/2013 09:01 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher: Am 14.08.13 20:21, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: Dear Rob The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should

Re: Some thoughts on quality

2013-08-14 Thread Marcus (OOo)
he 4.1 release is done we can see if this was much better - and ask ourself why? :-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Updating BZ versions for next releases

2013-08-05 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/05/2013 06:51 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/05/2013 06:31 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/05/2013 05:47 PM, schrieb janI: On 5 August 2013 17:38, Rob Weirwrote: I'd li

Re: Updating BZ versions for next releases

2013-08-05 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/05/2013 06:31 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 08/05/2013 05:47 PM, schrieb janI: On 5 August 2013 17:38, Rob Weir wrote: I'd like to update BZ to reflect the next release of AOO. Version are tracked in three different fields: Ve

Re: Updating BZ versions for next releases

2013-08-05 Thread Marcus (OOo)
ugs can be introduced anywhere, possible translation impact, etc. Personally I think 4.0.1 should be more like #1 -- strictly limited to specific bug fixes. We then use 4.1 (the trunk) for non-urgent fixes. OK, before I put in my 2 cents also here. Rob or Andrea, will yo

Re: Updating BZ versions for next releases

2013-08-05 Thread Marcus (OOo)
xed for 4.0.1 - general new things for 4.1.0 I'd love to hear your thoughts on this, even if it is just a quick +1. I'll hold off making any of these changes until this time Thursday. +1 to all except 4). I agree with Jan. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org