> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > I still haven't created project and repo in Phab, but if you approve
> > this as a way forward, I will.
>
> Just one thought - this could probably be rather useful for openQA
> too. We already have one case where we want to begin a t
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:21 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> I still haven't created project and repo in Phab, but if you approve
> this as a way forward, I will.
Just one thought - this could probably be rather useful for openQA
too. We already have one case where we want to begin a test with a
sp
Hello all,
There was recently a discussion on the Fedora Rel-Eng list as the
result of a Project Planning workflow[0]. As this was discussed
further in irc it was decided that this is likely a conversation that
should be had across more Fedora groups to see if there's a solution
that we would a
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210857 , but I see
> > you've found it already.
> >
> > For the time being, it seems that there's no benefit in giving the
> > VMs more than one CPU?
>
> Yeah, I think it'd make sense to change the config to one CPU. That's
> what I use on openqa.h
==
#fedora-meeting-1: qadevel
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-05-04/qadevel.2015-05-04-14.07.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-05-04/qadevel.2015-05-04-14.07.txt
Log:
htt
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:21:10 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> There are sample templates for minimal installation and Server and
> Workstation products. For more details, look into READMEs, it's
> fairly well documented, I think. My idea is that we will run this
> daily on the server, store the
