Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Kamil Paral
of security updates. Security updates would be applied to dev/stg immediately and after a few jobs were successfully executed, it would be applied to production. Would this approach work? I guess the approach with security updates would be the same, no matter whether it's Fedora or RHEL. So the only

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL? ...snip... While virt-in-virt is possible, I'd prefer to avoid the extra complexity and performance penalty and figure

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 12 May 2015 17:34:24 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:16:09 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 13:09:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:04 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
or RHEL. So the only difference in the volume and speed of standard updates. Yeah, that leads into one of the disadvantages of running Fedora - more frequent updates and especially more frequent kernel updates that require a reboot. This doesn't mean I'm in favor of running Fedora, I think you have

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 13 May 2015 09:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL? ...snip... While virt-in-virt

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:16:09 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 13:09:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:04 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: This was brought up a little while ago and we decided to put off the

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
, maybe logs and other data Thats each virthost, not all virthosts having the same storage right? ...snip good description of pros and cons... I think that infra would like to see us migrate to RHEL so that the Taskotron systems are more like everything else that supports Fedora but I don't

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-11 Thread Tim Flink
like to see us migrate to RHEL so that the Taskotron systems are more like everything else that supports Fedora but I don't think that they'd object to us running Fedora as long as we accept responsibility for keeping everything working and actually do it. If we do decide that we'd prefer

To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-09 Thread Tim Flink
host are running Fedora (F21 at the moment) which is fine but I'm wondering about migrating to RHEL for everything that doesn't have to run Fedora. For observers of this discussion - I'm not in any way asserting that Fedora isn't capable of running our production services well. I'm simply