On 05/06/2015 10:20 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
On 05/02/2015 12:47 AM, John Snow wrote:
On 04/03/2015 07:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/04/2015 12:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:39:27PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote:
The current algorithm to evict entries from the cache gives always
preference to those in the lowest positions. As the size of the cache
increases, the chances of the later elements of being removed decrease
exponentially.
In a
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:39:30PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote:
This function never receives an invalid table pointer, so we can make
it void and remove all the error checking code.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia be...@igalia.com
---
block/qcow2-cache.c| 7 +--
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:39:31PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote:
Fix pointer declaration to make it consistent with the rest of the
code.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia be...@igalia.com
---
block/qcow2-cache.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefan
On 06/05/2015 19:23, Max Reitz wrote:
The guest sees whatever has been written into reply-error, and that
field hasn't been written by this function in that case. It has been
written by nbd_receive_reply() in nbd.c, and that value comes directly
from the server. In case of qemu-nbd being the
On Thu, 05/07 14:20, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:52:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
v2: Fix typo and add Eric's rev-by in patch 3.
Add patch 1 to discard target in mirror job. (Paolo)
Add patch 6 to improve iotests.wait_ready. (John)
This fixes the mirror
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:52:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
v2: Fix typo and add Eric's rev-by in patch 3.
Add patch 1 to discard target in mirror job. (Paolo)
Add patch 6 to improve iotests.wait_ready. (John)
This fixes the mirror assert failure reported by wangxiaolong:
Am 07.05.2015 um 14:47 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 07/05/2015 14:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
No, it shouldn't indeed.
Could alloc_clusters_noref do bdrv_truncate and return ENOSPC if it
fails? That's how for example qcow and vhdx work. vdi has the same
problem.
If you
[ Cc: qemu-block ]
Am 30.04.2015 um 16:03 hat Keith Busch geschrieben:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The SCSI emulation in the Linux NVMe driver really wants to know
if a device has a volatile write cache. Given that qemu has moved
away from a model where we report the
On 07/05/2015 16:34, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 16:16 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 07/05/2015 16:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
This is not right for two reasons: The first is that this is
BlockBackend code
I think it would take effect for the qemu-nbd case though.
Oh, you want to
On Thu 07 May 2015 04:55:21 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
/* Give the table some hits for the start so that it won't be replaced
* immediately. The number 32 is completely arbitrary. */
-c-entries[i].cache_hits = 32;
c-entries[i].offset = offset;
The comment is now dead.
On 05/06/2015 07:39 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
The current algorithm to evict entries from the cache gives always
preference to those in the lowest positions. As the size of the cache
increases, the chances of the later elements of being removed decrease
exponentially.
In a scenario with
Am 07.05.2015 um 16:16 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 07/05/2015 16:07, Kevin Wolf wrote:
This is not right for two reasons: The first is that this is
BlockBackend code
I think it would take effect for the qemu-nbd case though.
Oh, you want to change the server code rather than the
In reference to b0ad5a45...078a458e, metadata writes to
qcow2/cow/qcow/vpc/vmdk are all synced prior to succeeding writes.
Only when write is successful that bdrv_flush is called.
Signed-off-by: Zhe Qiu phoea...@gmail.com
---
block/vdi.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:39:26PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote:
Since all tables are now stored together, it is possible to obtain
the position of a particular table directly from its address, so the
operation becomes O(1).
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia be...@igalia.com
---
Am 07.05.2015 um 14:20 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 06/05/2015 19:23, Max Reitz wrote:
The guest sees whatever has been written into reply-error, and that
field hasn't been written by this function in that case. It has been
written by nbd_receive_reply() in nbd.c, and that value
On 05/07/2015 10:54 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:04:44PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
+static void block_dirty_bitmap_clear_prepare(BlkTransactionState
*common, + Error
**errp) +{ +BlockDirtyBitmapState *state =
17 matches
Mail list logo
