There's a couple of places left in the qcow2 code that still do the
calculation manually, so let's replace them.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
---
block/qcow2.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
index 7c18721741..3866b47946
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 21.11.2019 um 11:32 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 06.11.2019 um 15:37 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> > > > On 17.10.19 15:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > The only
We have a test for full backup flow testing that we can consume the
data using our nbd client.
The test[0] is starting a full backup flow, based on Eric examples
from [1] and [2].
This used to work in 4.1, and broke when I upgraded to 4.2 rc5. Here
is the error I get:
E test.qmp.Co
On 12/12/19 4:01 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
There's a couple of places left in the qcow2 code that still do the
calculation manually, so let's replace them.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
---
block/qcow2.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> We have a test for full backup flow testing that we can consume the
> data using our nbd client.
>
> The test[0] is starting a full backup flow, based on Eric examples
> from [1] and [2].
Looking at qemu-iotests/256, I switch the order of the
On 12/12/19 1:32 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Nir Soffer wrote:
>>
>> We have a test for full backup flow testing that we can consume the
>> data using our nbd client.
>>
>> The test[0] is starting a full backup flow, based on Eric examples
>> from [1] and [2].
>
> L
On 12/12/19 3:04 PM, John Snow wrote:
On 12/12/19 1:32 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Nir Soffer wrote:
We have a test for full backup flow testing that we can consume the
data using our nbd client.
The test[0] is starting a full backup flow, based on Eric examples
f
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:34 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 12/12/19 3:04 PM, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/12/19 1:32 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Nir Soffer wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have a test for full backup flow testing that we can consume the
> >>> data using o
On 12/12/19 6:12 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> Thank you for the detailed answer!
>
> I'm sure blockdev is the greatest thing since sliced bread but it
> looks like overkill
> for our use case. I'm happy to use the node name generated by qemu.
>
Sometimes all you want is some toast, I agree.
>
On 18.11.2019 13:50, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 10.11.2019 22:08, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>
>> On 10.11.2019 22:03, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>> This allows to change (replace) the file on a block device and is
>>> useful
>>> to workaround exclusive file access restrictions, e.g. to implement
10 matches
Mail list logo