Per the 'Physical Layer Simplified Specification Version 3.01',
Table 4-22: 'Block Oriented Write Protection Commands'
SEND_WRITE_PROT (CMD30)
If the card provides write protection features, this command asks
the card to send the status of the write protection bits [1].
[1] 32 write
OSS-Fuzz found sending illegal addresses when querying the write
protection bits triggers the assertion added in commit 84816fb63e5
("hw/sd/sdcard: Assert if accessing an illegal group"):
qemu-fuzz-i386-target-generic-fuzz-sdhci-v3: ../hw/sd/sd.c:824: uint32_t
sd_wpbits(SDState *, uint64_t):
-20210803
for you to fetch changes up to 4ac0b72bae85cf94ae0e5153b9c2c288c71667d4:
hw/sd/sdcard: Fix assertion accessing out-of-range addresses with CMD30
(2021-08-03 19:34:51 +0200)
SD/MMC patches queue
- sdcard: Fix assertion
On 8/3/21 3:46 PM, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> On 210803 0155, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Fix an assertion reported by OSS-Fuzz, add corresponding qtest.
>>
>> The change is (now) simple enough for the next rc.
>>
>> Since v1:
>> - Simplified/corrected following Peter's suggestion
>>
>>
Am 20.07.2021 um 10:32 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:12:58PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > iotest 206 fails for me with:
> > >
> >
> > > --- 206.out
> > > +++ 206.out.bad
> > >
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:52:25AM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> commit 8dcd3c9b91 ("qemu-img: align result of is_allocated_sectors")
> introduces block alignment when doing qemu-img convert. However, the
> alignment is:
>
> s.alignment = MAX(pow2floor(s.min_sparse),
>
When bdrv_pad_request() fails in bdrv_co_preadv_part(), bs->in_flight
has been increased, but is never decreased again. This leads to a hang
when trying to drain the block node.
This bug was observed with Windows guests which issue a request that
fully uses IOV_MAX during installation, so that
The following changes since commit 7f1cab9c628a798ae2607940993771e6300e9e00:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini-gitlab/tags/for-upstream' into
staging (2021-08-02 17:21:50 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin.git tags/for-upstream
for you
Am 26.07.2021 um 16:46 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> We must check whether the job is force-cancelled early in our main loop,
> most importantly before any `continue` statement. For example, we used
> to have `continue`s before our current checking location that are
> triggered by `mirror_flush()`
Am 26.07.2021 um 16:46 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Hi,
>
> v1 cover letter:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-07/msg00705.html
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Added patch 2 (as suggested by Vladimir)
> - Patch 4 (ex. 3): Rebase conflicts because of patch 2
> - Patch 5 (ex. 4):
>
Am 26.07.2021 um 16:46 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Most callers of job_is_cancelled() actually want to know whether the job
> is on its way to immediate termination. For example, we refuse to pause
> jobs that are cancelled; but this only makes sense for jobs that are
> really actually
Am 26.07.2021 um 16:46 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Callers should be able to specify whether they want job_cancel_sync() to
> force-cancel the job or not.
>
> In fact, almost all invocations do not care about consistency of the
> result and just want the job to terminate as soon as possible, so
On 210803 0155, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Fix an assertion reported by OSS-Fuzz, add corresponding qtest.
>
> The change is (now) simple enough for the next rc.
>
> Since v1:
> - Simplified/corrected following Peter's suggestion
>
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2):
> hw/sd/sdcard: Document
From: mohit kapoor
Subject: [RFC PATCH : v3 2/2] Implementation of nvme-mi plugin in nvme-cli
The enclosed patch contains the implementation of a new
nvme mi(Management Interface) plugin. By adding the mi plugin into the
nvme-cli application, users have the ability to test the mi commands,
02.08.2021 13:23, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 17:47, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
27.07.2021 18:39, Max Reitz wrote:
On 27.07.21 15:04, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
26.07.2021 17:46, Max Reitz wrote:
Most callers of job_is_cancelled() actually want to know whether the job
is
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 00:55, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> Per the 'Physical Layer Simplified Specification Version 3.01',
> Table 4-22: 'Block Oriented Write Protection Commands'
>
> SEND_WRITE_PROT (CMD30)
>
> If the card provides write protection features, this command asks
> the
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 00:55, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> OSS-Fuzz found sending illegal addresses when querying the write
> protection bits triggers the assertion added in commit 84816fb63e5
> ("hw/sd/sdcard: Assert if accessing an illegal group"):
>
>
From: padmakar
This patch contains the implementation of certain commands
of nvme-mi specification.The MI commands are useful to
manage/configure/monitor the device.Eventhough the MI commands
can be sent via the inband NVMe-MI send/recieve commands, the idea
here is to emulate the sideband
18 matches
Mail list logo
