entation :)
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery
> ---
> hw/i2c/smbus_master.c | 26 ++
> include/hw/i2c/smbus_master.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i2c/smbus_master.c b/hw/i2c/smbus_master.c
> index 6a53c3
@huawei.com/
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20221121080445.ga29...@codeconstruct.com.au/
>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen
Nice!
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery
gt; +static void nmi_reset(MCTPI2CEndpoint *mctp)
> +{
> +NMIDevice *nmi = NMI_I2C_DEVICE(mctp);
> +nmi->len = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nmi_handle(MCTPI2CEndpoint *mctp)
> +{
> +NMIDevice *nmi = NMI_I2C_DEVICE(mctp);
> +NMIMessage *msg
Hi Klaus,
On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 08:51 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Sep 12 13:50, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 10:38 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +static void nmi_handle_mi_config_ge
Hi Klaus,
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 10:38 +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> >
> > +static void nmi_handle_mi_config_get(NMIDevice *nmi, NMIRequest
> > *request)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t dw0 = le32_to_cpu(request->dw0);
> > + uint8_t identifier = FIELD_EX32(dw0,
> > NMI_CMD_CONFIGURATION_GET_DW0,
> > +
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022, at 06:48, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 7/29/22 19:30, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
>> Certainly we'd like to use IRQ's instead, but she ran into correctness
>> problems. Maybe we can investigate that further and fix it.
Yes, let's not work around problems that we have the
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, at 16:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 7/25/22 04:08, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, at 16:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> aspeed_machine_witherspoon_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>> mc-&
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, at 16:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> A mx25l25635f chip model is generally found on these machines. It's
> newer and uses 4B opcodes which is better to exercise the support in
> the Linux kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
> ---
> hw/arm/aspeed.c | 6 +++---
> 1
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, at 18:13, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/22/20 2:21 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >>>
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, at 13:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 6/17/20 3:18 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
> >> the
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, at 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The current implementation uses nano-second precision, while
> the watchdog can not be more precise than a micro-second.
What's the basis for this assertion? It's true for the AST2500 and AST2600, but
the AST2400 can run the
11 matches
Mail list logo
