On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:31:21PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Back to the SDcard, it might be less critical, so a migration
> breaking change might be acceptable. I'm only aware of Paolo
> and Kevin using this device for testing. Not sure of its
> importance in production.
FWIW, I only
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 11:51:48AM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> But maybe someone wants bootorder but doesn’t want to override legacy disk
> translations…
>
> I’m thinking of maybe adding
>
> if (!CONFIG_BOOTORDER || !CONFIG_BIOS_GEOMETRY)
> return NULL;
That's fine - though it's (!CONFIG_B
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Sounds reasonable, how do purpose to deal with:
>
> config BIOS_GEOMETRY
> config BOOTORDER
>
> precompiler optouts?
I think you can stick them both under BOOTORDER. That option is only
there in case someone wants to reduce the siz
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:23:51PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Adding the following utility functions:
>
> * boot_lchs_find_pci_device
> * boot_lchs_find_scsi_device
> * boot_lchs_find_ata_device
FWIW, this leads to a bit of code duplication. I think it would be
preferable to refact
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:36:54AM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> So overall, WDYT?
> Keep it extendible for a low price of ABI + “bootdevices” name.
> Or go strict and rename to “bios-geometries”?
If we add another qemu to firmware interface I think the interface
should be documented. I also think
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:40:17PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> /* Capabilities registers provide information on supported features of
> >> this
> >> * specific host controller implementation */
> >> -static Property sdhci_pci_properties[] = {
> >> +static Property sdhci_properties
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:06:48AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > What's the reason for the "stumbling block" that requires the BIOS to
> > tear down the Xen ring prior to the OS being able to replace i
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:10:54AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/14/15 13:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:06 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> Can't you just teach SeaBIOS how to deal with your PV disks and then
> >>> only add that to your VM and forget about IDE/AHCI
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:20:40PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> The 2.88 drive is more suitable as a default because
> it can still read 1.44 images correctly, but the reverse
> is not true.
>
> Since there exist virtio-win drivers that are shipped on
> 2.88 floppy images, this patch will allow VMs b
