Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-05-17 Thread Yu Zhang
network adapters. One of them has: BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb RDMA Ethernet Controller (rev 01) The comparison between RDMA and TCP on the same NIC could make more sense. Best regards, Yu Zhang @ IONOS Cloud On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 7:30 PM Michael Galaxy wrote: > > These ar

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-05-14 Thread Yu Zhang
recent Ethernet NICs and keep you updated. It seems that the benefits of RDMA becomes obviously when the VM has large memory and is running memory-intensive workload. Best regards, Yu Zhang @ IONOS Cloud On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 4:14 PM Peter Xu wrote: > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:58:34PM

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-04-29 Thread Yu Zhang
when necessary Besides that, a patch is attached to announce this change in the community. With your generous support, we hope that the development community will make a positive decision for us. Kind regards, Yu Zhang@ IONOS Cloud On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:57 PM Peter Xu wrote: > > On Mon,

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-04-11 Thread Yu Zhang
> 1) Either a CI test covering at least the major RDMA paths, or at least > periodically tests for each QEMU release will be needed. We use a batch of regression test cases for the stack, which covers the test for QEMU. I did such test for most of the QEMU releases planned as candidates for

Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 v2 2/3] migration: Remove RDMA protocol handling

2024-04-01 Thread Yu Zhang
either to stick to the RDMA migration by using an increasingly older version of QEMU, or to abandon the currently used RDMA migration. Best regards, Yu Zhang On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:56 AM Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote: > > Phil, > > on 3/29/2024 6:28 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >