re/optmem_max) as the RFC says.Then
I tested the multifd zero_copy migration repeatedly，and the error
disappeared.
So when sendmsg returns -1 with errno ENOBUFS, should we distinguish
between error ''socket exceeds optmem limit" and error "user exceeds
ulimit on locked pages"? Or is there any better way to avoid this problem?
Best Regards,
chuang xu
On 2022/6/8 下午1:24, Leonardo Bras Soares Passos wrote:
I will send a fix shortly.
Is that ok if I include a "Reported-by: 徐闯
" in the patch?
okay.
Best Regards,
chuang xu
