On 10/28/20 2:36 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Niek,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:55 AM Niek Linnenbank
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Philippe, Bin,
>>
>> Thanks for your support on this. I've just tried this patch and
>> unfortunately it doesn't seem to
>> resolve the issue, at least on my machine. This is
Hi Niek,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:55 AM Niek Linnenbank
wrote:
>
> Hello Philippe, Bin,
>
> Thanks for your support on this. I've just tried this patch and unfortunately
> it doesn't seem to
> resolve the issue, at least on my machine. This is the output that I get when
> running the avocado
Hello Philippe, Bin,
Thanks for your support on this. I've just tried this patch and
unfortunately it doesn't seem to
resolve the issue, at least on my machine. This is the output that I get
when running the avocado test for NetBSD9.0:
(5/5)
On 10/24/20 3:49 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
From: Bin Meng
The function selection fields (399:376) should be zeroed out to
prevent leftover from being or'ed into the switch function status
data structure.
This fixes the boot failure as seen in the acceptance testing on
the orangepi target.
Fixes:
On 10/24/20 3:49 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
From: Bin Meng
The function selection fields (399:376) should be zeroed out to
prevent leftover from being or'ed into the switch function status
data structure.
This fixes the boot failure as seen in the acceptance testing on
the orangepi target.
Fixes:
From: Bin Meng
The function selection fields (399:376) should be zeroed out to
prevent leftover from being or'ed into the switch function status
data structure.
This fixes the boot failure as seen in the acceptance testing on
the orangepi target.
Fixes: b638627c723a ("hw/sd: Fix incorrect
