On 07/06/2021 18:18, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
07.06.2021 18:16, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
On 07/06/2021 17:10, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.06.2021 um 09:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 02/06/21 14:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschr
07.06.2021 18:16, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
On 07/06/2021 17:10, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.06.2021 um 09:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 02/06/21 14:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Se
On 07/06/2021 17:10, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.06.2021 um 09:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 02/06/21 14:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
This is my sugges
Am 03.06.2021 um 09:38 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 02/06/21 14:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi all!
> > > >
> > > > This is my suggestion
On 02/06/21 14:21, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi all!
This is my suggestion how to refactor block-copy to avoid extra atomic
operations in
"[PATCH v2 0/7] block-copy: pr
Am 02.06.2021 um 11:13 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > This is my suggestion how to refactor block-copy to avoid extra atomic
> > operations in
> > "[PATCH v2 0/7] block-copy: protect block-copy i
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:16:26PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> This is my suggestion how to refactor block-copy to avoid extra atomic
> operations in
> "[PATCH v2 0/7] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures"
>
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
> block
Hi all!
This is my suggestion how to refactor block-copy to avoid extra atomic
operations in
"[PATCH v2 0/7] block-copy: protect block-copy internal structures"
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (2):
block-copy: fix block_copy_task_entry() progress update
block-copy: refactor copy_range handling