On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 02/03/2020 08:10, Markus Armbruster wrote:
BALATON Zoltan writes:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 29/02/2020 23:02, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
via-ide but we already
On 02/03/2020 08:10, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> BALATON Zoltan writes:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> On 29/02/2020 23:02, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
via-ide but we already have a currently CMD646 spe
BALATON Zoltan writes:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> On 29/02/2020 23:02, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
>>> via-ide but we already have a currently CMD646 specific field that can
>>> be repurposed for this and lea
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 29/02/2020 23:02, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
via-ide but we already have a currently CMD646 specific field that can
be repurposed for this and leave room for furhter flags if needed in
On 29/02/2020 23:02, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
> via-ide but we already have a currently CMD646 specific field that can
> be repurposed for this and leave room for furhter flags if needed in
> the future. This patch changes the "se
We'll need a flag for implementing some device specific behaviour in
via-ide but we already have a currently CMD646 specific field that can
be repurposed for this and leave room for furhter flags if needed in
the future. This patch changes the "secondary" field to "flags" and
define the flags for C
