On 15/02/2022 14.51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 11/02/2022 17.48, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 11/02/2022 17.14, Eric Blake wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
The current code with $SED has been
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 11/02/2022 17.48, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 11/02/2022 17.14, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > > > The current code with $SED has been introduced almost three years
> > > >
On 11/02/2022 17.48, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 11/02/2022 17.14, Eric Blake wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
The current code with $SED has been introduced almost three years
ago already...
Can’t we just do `alias sed=gsed`?
Maybe ... but let's ask
On 11/02/2022 17.14, Eric Blake wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
The current code with $SED has been introduced almost three years
ago already...
Can’t we just do `alias sed=gsed`?
Maybe ... but let's ask Philippe and Kevin first, who Signed-off
commit
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > The current code with $SED has been introduced almost three years
> > > ago already...
> > >
> > > > Can’t we just do `alias sed=gsed`?
> > >
> > > Maybe ... but let's ask Philippe and Kevin first, who Signed-off
> > > commit
On 08/02/2022 14.11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 8/2/22 13:38, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 13.28, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 13:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 12.46, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not
On 8/2/22 13:38, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 13.28, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 13:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 12.46, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or
skipping
them completely in the
On 08.02.22 13:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 12.46, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests, so
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests, so that the python-based tests could
still be run. Thus add the check for BusyBox
On 08/02/2022 13.28, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 13:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/02/2022 12.46, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better
On 08/02/2022 12.46, Hanna Reitz wrote:
On 08.02.22 11:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests, so that the python-based tests could
still
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests, so that the python-based tests could
still be run. Thus add the check for BusyBox sed to common.rc and mark
the tests as
12 matches
Mail list logo