On 7/10/23 22:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:08:33PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev via wrote:
>> When target image is using subclusters, and we align the request during
>> copy-on-read, it makes sense to align to subcluster_size rather than
>> cluster_size. Otherwise we end up with u
On 6/26/23 18:08, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
When target image is using subclusters, and we align the request during
copy-on-read, it makes sense to align to subcluster_size rather than
cluster_size. Otherwise we end up with unnecessary allocations.
This commit renames bdrv_round_to_clusters() to
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:08:33PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev via wrote:
> When target image is using subclusters, and we align the request during
> copy-on-read, it makes sense to align to subcluster_size rather than
> cluster_size. Otherwise we end up with unnecessary allocations.
>
> This commit
When target image is using subclusters, and we align the request during
copy-on-read, it makes sense to align to subcluster_size rather than
cluster_size. Otherwise we end up with unnecessary allocations.
This commit renames bdrv_round_to_clusters() to bdrv_round_to_subclusters()
and utilizes sub
