Got it - thanks for the clarification.
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:34:11AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 28.04.2021 um 21:24 hat Raphael Norwitz geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Commit 2943b53f6 (' virtio: force
Am 28.04.2021 um 21:24 hat Raphael Norwitz geschrieben:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Commit 2943b53f6 (' virtio: force VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM') made sure
> > that vhost can't just reject VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when it was
> > requested. However, just adding
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Commit 2943b53f6 (' virtio: force VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM') made sure
> that vhost can't just reject VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when it was
> requested. However, just adding it back to the negotiated flags isn't
> right either because it
Commit 2943b53f6 (' virtio: force VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM') made sure
that vhost can't just reject VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM when it was
requested. However, just adding it back to the negotiated flags isn't
right either because it promises support to the guest that the device
actually doesn't
