On 18.09.19 22:50, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 11:51 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> We have two drivers (iscsi and file-posix) that (in some cases) return
>> success from their .bdrv_co_truncate() implementation if the block
>> device is larger than the requested offset, but cannot be
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 11:51 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> We have two drivers (iscsi and file-posix) that (in some cases) return
> success from their .bdrv_co_truncate() implementation if the block
> device is larger than the requested offset, but cannot be shrunk. Some
> callers do not want that beha
We have two drivers (iscsi and file-posix) that (in some cases) return
success from their .bdrv_co_truncate() implementation if the block
device is larger than the requested offset, but cannot be shrunk. Some
callers do not want that behavior, so this patch adds a new parameter
that they can use t